Re: octane and u2w scsi woes
- From: tom_h_57@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 20 Sep 2005 19:39:46 -0700
thomasp wrote:
> thanks so far for the responses.
>
> good to know that the drives will not show up in the maintenance menu.
> my box is running 6.5.27 so i guess irix version can't be the problem.
> actually i have two 1080 (slighty different revisions) and both refuse
> to work.
> i'll look into the calbing issue and test the controllers in the PC.
>
> tom, can you comment on how much data your 1080's can push through in
> an octane? i looked up the article you mentioned and it got me worried
> that it was stated that it doesn't push more data than a 1040.
We haven't checked the throughput on the QLA 1080 cards, and the Octane
systems that use them are legacy units for us -- so we don't really
care about throughput as long as the drives work.
We also have some QLA 12160 cards -- the end users think the
performance is better on those systems but no one has actually
measured them.
We have seen no problems with the QLA 12160 cards, as opposed to the
mixed results that we've had with the QLA 1080 cards.
A couple of suggestions for you:
1. Are you certain that your PCI card cage works?
2. If you unplug all devices from the QLA 1080, does it show up in
hinv?
Example:
>>hinv
1 400 MHZ IP30 Processor
CPU: MIPS R12000 Processor Chip Revision: 3.5
FPU: MIPS R12010 Floating Point Chip Revision: 0.0
Main memory size: 3584 Mbytes
Xbow ASIC: Revision 1.4
Instruction cache size: 32 Kbytes
Data cache size: 32 Kbytes
Secondary unified instruction/data cache size: 2 Mbytes
Integral SCSI controller 0: Version QL1040B (rev. 2), single ended
Disk drive: unit 1 on SCSI controller 0
Disk drive: unit 2 on SCSI controller 0
Disk drive: unit 3 on SCSI controller 0
Integral SCSI controller 1: Version QL1040B (rev. 2), single ended
CDROM: unit 4 on SCSI controller 1
Integral SCSI controller 2: Version QL1080, low voltage differential
IOC3/IOC4 serial port: tty1
IOC3/IOC4 serial port: tty2
IOC3 parallel port: plp1
Graphics board: V6
Regards, Tom H.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: octane and u2w scsi woes
- From: thomasp
- Re: octane and u2w scsi woes
- References:
- octane and u2w scsi woes
- From: thomasp
- Re: octane and u2w scsi woes
- From: tom_h_57
- Re: octane and u2w scsi woes
- From: thomasp
- octane and u2w scsi woes
- Prev by Date: Re: V10 scan rates & colour resolutions
- Next by Date: Thank you for joining our E-Mail List
- Previous by thread: Re: octane and u2w scsi woes
- Next by thread: Re: octane and u2w scsi woes
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|