Re: Is clamshell mode cpu more economical?
- From: dorayme <dorayme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 20:07:18 +1000
In article <0001HW.CAA46E2202956A98B02919BF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Nelson <nelson@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In the context of this discussion, you could run
clamshell/open for an hour each and see what the difference was.
No doubt you mean clamshell/not clamshell by this distinction,
but there is a subtlety, you can have clamshell with the lid open
as far as I can tell.
--
dorayme
.
- References:
- Is clamshell mode cpu more economical?
- From: dorayme
- Re: Is clamshell mode cpu more economical?
- From: Alan Browne
- Re: Is clamshell mode cpu more economical?
- From: dorayme
- Re: Is clamshell mode cpu more economical?
- From: Alan Browne
- Re: Is clamshell mode cpu more economical?
- From: Alan Browne
- Is clamshell mode cpu more economical?
- Prev by Date: Re: What does Apple do?
- Next by Date: Re: Apple, Dropbox join Electronic Privacy Act fight
- Previous by thread: Re: Is clamshell mode cpu more economical?
- Next by thread: Re: Is clamshell mode cpu more economical?
- Index(es):