Re: This year's iMac vs. last year's?
- From: Jolly Roger <jollyroger@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2009 22:46:47 -0500
In article
<OurOwnRonnieBateman-6E8CC0.17533905082009@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
,
Ronnie Bateman <OurOwnRonnieBateman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From what you
and Jolly Roger say, it sounds like the graphics issue is legitimate and
not just some dishonest sales pitch....but it also sounds like it's not
really too important for me personally. Hm. And the salesman didn't ask
about much my personal computer needs, so maybe he projected his own
"maximum" graphics requirements onto me.
I think you must have misunderstood me. The salesman was WRONG.
--
Send responses to the relevant news group rather than email to me.
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my very hungry SPAM
filter. Due to Google's refusal to prevent spammers from posting
messages through their servers, I often ignore posts from Google
Groups. Use a real news client if you want me to see your posts.
JR
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: This year's iMac vs. last year's?
- From: Jolly Roger
- Re: This year's iMac vs. last year's?
- References:
- Re: This year's iMac vs. last year's?
- From: Neill Massello
- Re: This year's iMac vs. last year's?
- From: Jolly Roger
- Re: This year's iMac vs. last year's?
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: This year's iMac vs. last year's?
- Prev by Date: Re: This year's iMac vs. last year's?
- Next by Date: Re: This year's iMac vs. last year's?
- Previous by thread: Re: This year's iMac vs. last year's?
- Next by thread: Re: This year's iMac vs. last year's?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
