Re: 10.4 on 400MHz



In article <1ir32ju.1sxlegw1v9gzt6N%nonesuch@xxxxxxxxxx>, Adrian
<nonesuch@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Why would that be? OS X versions got faster up to 10.4 Tiger. Leopard
slightly slower on PPC but presumably faster still on Intel.

Why do you people always insist on running software on hardware that's
below the minimum requirement?
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Linux Dealt a DEATH BLOW by Apple !!!!!!!
    ... >> the intel based binary, it will still run on intel hardware through the ... > an inevitable hardware upgrade within a fairly short time. ... > Win for Linux then, Apple's just another hardware vendor to us. ... the soon to be glut of used PPC hardware ...
    (comp.os.linux.misc)
  • Re: Linux Dealt a DEATH BLOW by Apple !!!!!!!
    ... >> the intel based binary, it will still run on intel hardware through the ... > an inevitable hardware upgrade within a fairly short time. ... > Win for Linux then, Apple's just another hardware vendor to us. ... the soon to be glut of used PPC hardware ...
    (alt.os.linux)
  • Re: 10.4 on 400MHz
    ... slightly slower on PPC but presumably faster still on Intel. ... Why do you people always insist on running software on hardware that's ...
    (comp.sys.mac.system)
  • Re: fortran free compiler quad precision
    ... The ABSOFT compiler supports 128-bit floating point on intel and PPC ... hardware. ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Re: Linux Dealt a DEATH BLOW by Apple !!!!!!!
    ... >> Goodbye desktop Linux, your days are numbered as Apple moves to Intel ... >> FINALLY we Intel users will have a quality Unix Desktop System to run. ... They can take their PPC platforms, ... *new* PPC hardware from other venders with Linux as the OS, ...
    (comp.os.linux.misc)