Re: Mail Receipt Notification?
- From: Ian Gregory <foo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 31 Oct 2008 14:27:19 GMT
On 2008-10-31, salgud <spamboy6547@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:46:58 -0600, Tom Harrington wrote:
It's the same scheme that spammers use with HTML emails, and about as
obnoxious, as far as I'm concerned. All the more reason (as if there
wasn't reason enough already) to turn off loading of images for incoming
emails.
Which would eliminate the purpose of a good portion of my emails - the pix
that people send me! Don't think I'm the least bit interested in
eliminating getting those pix.
Turning off loading images for incoming emails would not make any
difference to the ability to receive photos. The standard way to send
photos is to attach them to a plain text email. Turning off loading
images only applies to HTML emails and even then only to inline images,
not attached images. Inline images as opposed to attached images are
normally just things like bullet point markers, logos etc, and of course
the transparent gifs used to spy on you.
If it ever turns out that you get an HTML email with inline images that
are not malware and that you do actually want to look at then you can
always load images for that email while having it turned off by default.
Ian
--
Ian Gregory
http://www.zenatode.org.uk/ian/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Mail Receipt Notification?
- From: salgud
- Re: Mail Receipt Notification?
- References:
- Mail Receipt Notification?
- From: Meerkat1
- Re: Mail Receipt Notification?
- From: Jolly Roger
- Re: Mail Receipt Notification?
- From: Tom Harrington
- Re: Mail Receipt Notification?
- From: salgud
- Mail Receipt Notification?
- Prev by Date: Re: Rationale behind Apple wireless keyboard design?
- Next by Date: Re: Off switch blues
- Previous by thread: Re: Mail Receipt Notification?
- Next by thread: Re: Mail Receipt Notification?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|