Re: Rationale behind Apple wireless keyboard design?
- From: Mal Thomas <draconus@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 10:14:48 GMT
On 31/10/08 2:41 AM, in article 1ipmdd8.h6s2u618ayxz4N%nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx,
"Richard Maine" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Andy Hewitt <thewildrover@xxxxxx> wrote:
Mal Thomas <draconus@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Does anyone know why the numeric keypad and other ancillary buttons are
missing from the Apple wireless keyboard ?
I am sure if it was identical to the wired keyboard (apart from being
wireless of course), more people would probably consider buying one, I know
I would.
No answer I'm afraid, but I'm with you on this one. I recently wanted a
wireless keyboard, but like you the missing numeric pad was a show
stopper for me. I ended up looking for the older keyboard on eBay, and
found one, but I would have bought a brand new wireless one from Apple
had it got the full set of keys.
Me too. I quite like the new Apple wired keyboard (I'm typing on one
now). At first I thought perhaps I wouldn't, but I did rapidly get used
to it. I prefer wireless. No way I'll touch one of those new wireless
ones, though.
As for the reason - well, even though I personally don't like them, it
doesn't exactly take rocket science to figure out what the reason has to
be. (Heck, I can even claim to be a retired "rocket scientist" if it
comes to that). No, it isn't going to be production costs. It is pretty
much bound to be a judgement of the customer base - that people wanting
a wireless keyboard were likely to place a higher value on the improved
portability from the smaller size.
I have no special inside information on the reasoning, but I'm really
quite confident that this is the reason. It's just too obvious. Again, I
don't personally like it, but that doesn't keep me from deducing what
the reason must be.
Yes, I pondered that as well - the wireless aspect does keep the size down
and I suppose being portable suggests people would prefer a smaller
footprint too. Of course I would probably get used to not having the
numeric keypad - I just find it very handy for online banking and other
number intensive functions.
As for trying others, yes I have, but don't I find that the Logitech and
Microsoft keyboards give me the same tactile experience. Yeah that probably
sounds like a lot of w*nk, but the Apple keys have very nice feel to them
and I like the way the keys respond. They are almost (and I stress almost)
like the old Click-O-matic keyboards that IBM used to ship out from Mexico
in the '80s. I had an old one of them stuck into my Windows boxes for years
- only just getting used to life without it <grin>.
One other thing that's probably holding me back is that I like the extra USB
port in the keyboard - then again, USB hubs are cheap these days.
Oh what to do, what to do ...???
Cheers
Mal
Oz
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Rationale behind Apple wireless keyboard design?
- From: Design-Methods
- Re: Rationale behind Apple wireless keyboard design?
- References:
- Rationale behind Apple wireless keyboard design?
- From: Mal Thomas
- Re: Rationale behind Apple wireless keyboard design?
- From: Andy Hewitt
- Re: Rationale behind Apple wireless keyboard design?
- From: Richard Maine
- Rationale behind Apple wireless keyboard design?
- Prev by Date: Re: One great reason to learn speech recognition
- Next by Date: Re: One great reason to learn speech recognition
- Previous by thread: Re: Rationale behind Apple wireless keyboard design?
- Next by thread: Re: Rationale behind Apple wireless keyboard design?
- Index(es):