Re: 'OpenMac' Promises Mac Pro pefromance at Mac Mini prices!
- From: The New guy <noemailhere@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:00:49 -0500
What you wrote was circular reasoning; you said that Vista is
slower, and the proof of that is that the Vista machine was slower.
Vista is far more hardware demanding than XP. It would have been far
superior had they done the same bench tests using XP.
So long as they use the same OS on both machines, it doesn't matter.
I thought all the tests were with different OS's. Only at the end, sort
of as an afterthought, was the Mac loaded compared with Windows. Then
it was just "faster". Pretty vague. Unless I read it wrong.
.
- References:
- Re: 'OpenMac' Promises Mac Pro pefromance at Mac Mini prices!
- From: Ajanta
- Re: 'OpenMac' Promises Mac Pro pefromance at Mac Mini prices!
- From: Mike Rosenberg
- Re: 'OpenMac' Promises Mac Pro pefromance at Mac Mini prices!
- From: The New guy
- Re: 'OpenMac' Promises Mac Pro pefromance at Mac Mini prices!
- From: The New guy
- Re: 'OpenMac' Promises Mac Pro pefromance at Mac Mini prices!
- From: The New guy
- Re: 'OpenMac' Promises Mac Pro pefromance at Mac Mini prices!
- From: The New guy
- Re: 'OpenMac' Promises Mac Pro pefromance at Mac Mini prices!
- From: The New guy
- Re: 'OpenMac' Promises Mac Pro pefromance at Mac Mini prices!
- From: The New guy
- Re: 'OpenMac' Promises Mac Pro pefromance at Mac Mini prices!
- From: The New guy
- Re: 'OpenMac' Promises Mac Pro pefromance at Mac Mini prices!
- From: The New guy
- Re: 'OpenMac' Promises Mac Pro pefromance at Mac Mini prices!
- Prev by Date: Re: VLC
- Next by Date: Re: Forgetting to unmount drive before unplugging
- Previous by thread: Re: 'OpenMac' Promises Mac Pro pefromance at Mac Mini prices!
- Next by thread: Re: 'OpenMac' Promises Mac Pro pefromance at Mac Mini prices!
- Index(es):