Re: what hardware config to get for doing sw development
- From: Steven Fisher <sdfisher@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2007 19:39:35 GMT
In article
<jollyroger-30ED43.13584602112007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Jolly Roger <jollyroger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Even a Core Solo mini would do for software development.
That's what I use.
(In fact, I wish all software developers would use the slowest machines
possible to develop software. If they did, maybe we wouldn't see such
bloated, slow monstrous software being released. ; )
Yeah. If I had a couple extra systems kicking around to do the compile
I'd be completely happy. Well, actually, dual core would probably be
nice. My application wouldn't take advantage of it, but it would let me
respond to run away applications better.
One of the languages I used to use was an interpreted language that
could be compiled (Prograph). We had to build a grid for it, and the
first version mostly sucked. I remember how happy I was when I got that
grid running faster in the interpreter than the previous version had run
in the compiler. And then I compiled it, and it was more than an order
of magnitude faster still. Ah, that was a good upgrade.
.
- References:
- what hardware config to get for doing sw development
- From: arzewski@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: what hardware config to get for doing sw development
- From: Gregory Weston
- Re: what hardware config to get for doing sw development
- From: Jolly Roger
- what hardware config to get for doing sw development
- Prev by Date: Re: Mighty Mouse - Nice try Apple.
- Next by Date: Re: Mighty Mouse - Nice try Apple.
- Previous by thread: Re: what hardware config to get for doing sw development
- Next by thread: Re: what hardware config to get for doing sw development
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
