Re: Tips sought for optimizing 10.4.10's performance

On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 17:38:51 -0700, Bob Harris replied
(in article <nospam.News.Bob-E2621F.20371726062007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>):

In article
<0001HW.C2A679AF0006FACAF0407530@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Eric P. <ericpNOSPAM06@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hello,

After only a few days of use, I can already tell that OS X 10.4.10 is
an improvement over 10.4.9 in some ways. Still, I'm interested in
whatever I can do to maximize system performance, or (if this is a
better approach) to find the optimal balance between speed and
stability. When in doubt, I'll always choose stability.

So, I'm interested in any tips, good maintenance habits, and/or leads
to sources of information on how to achieve the fastest, most stable OS
X system on my G4 Quicksilver (single 1.47GHz Processor, 512MB RAM).
I'm not at all afraid of the Terminal, as I've had some exposure to
UNIX in the past.

TIA and happy computing,
Eric


================================================================
Hogwasher: You don't have to sacrifice friendliness for power
http://www.asar.com/cgi-bin/product.pl?58/hogwasher.html
================================================================

RAM, but depending on what you are doing there is a limit after
which more does not translate to better performance, just lighter
wallet. If you're doing graphics or video editing, even more RAM.
If just reading email and surfing the web, 1GB to maybe 1.5GB
should be more than enough assuming you want to keep lots of stuff
open currently. If you are a 10 to 20 apps open at once type
then maybe 2GB but that may be still be over kill.

I work with images in Photoshop quite a bit, and this machine will
eventually be transformed into an audio engineering workstation, which
may mean that my old Sawtooth will have to serve for all other purposes
(Office apps, image editing, Internet access, and gaming), till I'm
ready to replace it with something better...or retire it, have the
Quicksilver take over those functions, and get a newer, better machine
to be the audio workstation.

RAM is a can-do; I just confirmed to buy a pair of 512MB DIMMs, which
will combine with the largest module I currently have installed to max
out this machine at 1.5GB...at least I'm reasonably sure that the G4
Quicksilver can take a maximum of 1.5GB.

Faster disk drives. If you do not have 7200 RPM disks, then
upgrade to disks with those speeds. If you can get 16MB cache on
the disks even better.

I know my external FW HD is that speed, but I don't know if the same is
true for the internal HD in the QS. How may I determine this? Also
don't know how to determine the caches.

After that it starts to become a case of do I spend more money for
a CPU upgrade, or do I just get a new Mac. I've always been in
the get a new Mac camp, but others have found happiness with a CPU
upgrade.

Bob Harris

I've already installed the fastest processor this machine will take. My
hope is to hotrod it out in every hw and sw way I can, then boldly go
:)

Thanks,
Eric


==============================================================
Posted with Hogwasher. For a free Test Drive click on:
http://www.asar.com/cgi-bin/product.pl?58/hogwasher.html
==============================================================

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: What kind of RAM?
    ... No warrantee. ... not mentioned is BUS speeds. ... I understand you want to know your RAM upgrade options. ... The RAM chips your system supports do not need to be matched for size ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics)
  • Re: Deciding weather to go for terminal server?
    ... just fine on 256 MB of RAM, running too many memory intensive applications ... Even an upgrade from 256 to 512 MB should produce a significant gain; ... XP Home and XP Pro should have nearly identical ... and going for a central Terminal Server. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.terminal_services)
  • Re: help please, my computer isnt working right
    ... Gail B wrote: ... > it was suggested that i make sure that a disk isn't in the cd writer ... I would recommend installing the maximum amount of RAM your system will take ... did you run the upgrade advisor before upgrading? ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support)
  • Re: Deciding weather to go for terminal server?
    ... Upgrading the RAM from 256 MB to 1 GB will make huge difference, ... Even an upgrade from 256 to 512 MB should produce a significant gain; ... XP Home and XP Pro should have nearly identical ... and going for a central Terminal Server. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.terminal_services)
  • Re: DAMN YOU, GOOGLE!
    ... My 2MB ram was a factory upgrade -- standard for it was 1MB. ... Generic 7-in-1 USB card reader (internal) ... John Turco ...
    (rec.photo.digital)