Re: Osxvnc vs ARD on tiger
- From: Jerry Kindall <jerrykindall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2005 16:33:45 -0800
In article <BF8D831D.1C6BE%nomail@xxxxxxxxxx>, Andrea D.
> I've read a couple of post which said that ARD has better performance
> compared to osxvnc on Tiger. Is it true?
osxvnc will support JPEG encoding. ARD will not. This will make a
huge difference in performance when you're working with a client that
supports JPEG, such as TightVNC on the PC.
Otherwise, no real diffeernce, IMHO.
Jerry Kindall, Seattle, WA <http://www.jerrykindall.com/>
Send only plain text messages under 32K to the Reply-To address.
This mailbox is filtered aggressively to thwart spam and viruses.