Re: With Tiger is OS 9 pointless?
- From: Barry Margolin <barmar@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 17:20:49 -0400
In article <020820051905177479%helpful_harry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Helpful Harry <helpful_harry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > there are quite a few people who still depend on
> > it. My guess, though, is that it's not much more than 10% of Mac users
> > or Apple would have figured out some way to keep providing it in
> > Macintel.
>
> You probably mean "10% of NEW Mac BUYERS". There's WAY more than 10% of
> Mac USERS still using Mac OS 9 or earlier. :o)
Are you including all the ones who haven't bothered upgrading to OS X in
the first place? I was just talking about people using Classic in OS X,
and perhaps should also also those who dual-boot.
--
Barry Margolin, barmar@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Arlington, MA
*** PLEASE post questions in newsgroups, not directly to me ***
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: With Tiger is OS 9 pointless?
- From: Scott Ellsworth
- Re: With Tiger is OS 9 pointless?
- References:
- Re: With Tiger is OS 9 pointless?
- From: Anders Eklöf
- Re: With Tiger is OS 9 pointless?
- From: matt neuburg
- Re: With Tiger is OS 9 pointless?
- From: Ricky
- Re: With Tiger is OS 9 pointless?
- From: Gregory Weston
- Re: With Tiger is OS 9 pointless?
- From: Al
- Re: With Tiger is OS 9 pointless?
- From: Ricky
- Re: With Tiger is OS 9 pointless?
- From: Anders Eklöf
- Re: With Tiger is OS 9 pointless?
- From: Ricky
- Re: With Tiger is OS 9 pointless?
- From: Barry Margolin
- Re: With Tiger is OS 9 pointless?
- From: Helpful Harry
- Re: With Tiger is OS 9 pointless?
- Prev by Date: Installing .deb files on OS X.
- Next by Date: Re: MS Works files from PC to Mac
- Previous by thread: Re: With Tiger is OS 9 pointless?
- Next by thread: Re: With Tiger is OS 9 pointless?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|