Re: With Tiger is OS 9 pointless?
- From: Gregory Weston <uce@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 20:25:56 -0400
In article <uAyGe.148$dp1.2461@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Ricky" <rickydontlivehere@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Other examples:
> >
> > FrameMaker. Sorry, but I make my living in this app.
> Classic is crucial.
> > (And works great.) m.
>
> Newbie question: There's Classic and there's OS 9. What's
> the difference? Can one use Classic on OSX 10.4?
Mac OS 9 is the last version of Mac OS that predates Mac OS X.
Classic is the user-friendly name for the OS X process which uses Mac OS
9.x to provide an environment in which legacy applications may run.
One can use Classic in every version of OS X thus far.
G
--
Goal 2005: Convincing James Hetfield to cover the Strawberry Shortcake
"Are You Berry Berry Happy?" song.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: With Tiger is OS 9 pointless?
- From: David C.
- Re: With Tiger is OS 9 pointless?
- From: Al
- Re: With Tiger is OS 9 pointless?
- References:
- Re: With Tiger is OS 9 pointless?
- From: Anders Eklöf
- Re: With Tiger is OS 9 pointless?
- From: matt neuburg
- Re: With Tiger is OS 9 pointless?
- From: Ricky
- Re: With Tiger is OS 9 pointless?
- Prev by Date: Re: With Tiger is OS 9 pointless?
- Next by Date: Re: With Tiger is OS 9 pointless?
- Previous by thread: Re: With Tiger is OS 9 pointless?
- Next by thread: Re: With Tiger is OS 9 pointless?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|