Re: 0SX 10.0.2 Crap?
- From: Asterix <Asterix@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 23:38:03 GMT
In article <1135895549.566427.158320@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
joeyp770 <joeyporter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Now here is my question: Some other groups have said that 10.0.2 can
> not handle firefox, is that the case? If this is the case, can someone
> please prove it to me.
You *could* start by reading the system requirements om the site you
downloaded Firefox from ...
http://www.mozilla.com/firefox/system-requirements.html
Hrmm.. that page says 10.3 while the release notes say 10.2 is required.
--
I recommend Macs to my friends, and Windows machines
to those whom I don't mind billing by the hour
.
- References:
- 0SX 10.0.2 Crap?
- From: joeyp770
- 0SX 10.0.2 Crap?
- Prev by Date: Re: Junk Mail folder in Mail 2 on Tiger
- Next by Date: Re: 0SX 10.0.2 Crap?
- Previous by thread: Re: 0SX 10.0.2 Crap?
- Next by thread: Re: 0SX 10.0.2 Crap?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
