Re: Thunderstorms
- From: bud-- <remove.budnews@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 14:00:02 -0500
w_tom wrote:
On Jul 31, 5:04 pm, Jolly Roger <jollyro...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:..And those cheap-o power strips aren't even the kind of surge protectors
I'm talking about! I have never considered those to be "surge
protectors" any more than I consider a crappy moped to be a
"motorcycle"! ; )
Where does it list protection from each type of surge?
Where does SquareD "list protection from each type of surge"? It doesn’t. "Each type of surge" is bullcrap. Plug-in suppressors have MOVs from H-N, H-G, N-G. That is all possible combinations.
..
Two simple rules make reality obvious:..
1) It has no dedicated connection to earth ground.
2) Manufacturer discusses earthing where? No earthing discussion
Poor w_'s religious blinders prevent him from understanding how plug-in suppressors work. The IEEE guide explains it is primarily by clamping, not earthing.
..
What does the NIST require of effective protectors on Adobe page 19..
of 24?
What does the NIST guide really say about plug-in suppressors?
They are the "easiest solution".
..
Will a pathetic 420 joules absorb an entire surge? Surges may be..
tens of thousands of joules; or more. How does a ‘near zero’ 420
joules absorb that entire surge?
Repeating:
"Arc-over plus the impedance of branch circuits limit the current, and thus energy that can flow to a plug-in suppressor to a surprisingly small value." After arc-over starts, at about 6,000V, the arc voltage drops to hundreds of volts.
How small? Experiments with a MOV at the end of branch circuits 30 ft and longer, with a surge current up to 10,000A, the maximum MOV energy dissipation was 35J. In 13 of 15 cases it was 1 Joule or less.
Another paper looked at a 100,000A (very strong) lightning strike to a utility pole behind a house in typical urban distribution (near worst case scenario). The current to the house was 10,000A per hot wire. Note 10,000A was used above.
(The plug-in suppressors I am using have a far higher rating than 420J.)
..
A surge protector is only as effective as its earth ground...
The required religious mantra.
Still no link to another lunatic that agrees with w_ that plug-in suppressors are NOT effective.
Still no answers to embarrassing questions:
- Why do the only 2 examples of protection in the IEEE guide use plug-in suppressors?
- Why does the NIST guide says plug-in suppressors are "the easiest solution"?
- Why does the IEEE guide say in the example "the only effective way of protecting the equipment is to use a multiport protector"?
- How would a service panel suppressor provide any protection in the example?
--
bud--
.
- References:
- Re: Thunderstorms
- From: w_tom
- Re: Thunderstorms
- Prev by Date: Re: jpeg images not opening in Safari
- Next by Date: Re: grouping folders? revealing full location?
- Previous by thread: Re: Thunderstorms
- Next by thread: Re: Thunderstorms
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading