Re: Legitimate postings marked as junk?
- From: Jolly Roger <jollyroger@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 20:45:36 -0500
In article <SalmonEgg-64A5CB.18294227042008@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Salmon Egg <SalmonEgg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article
<wayne.morris-CD7005.12153327042008@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Wayne C. Morris" <wayne.morris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The spam posts are NOT being marked by other people. They're being
marked by the program you're using. MT-NewsWatcher has a built-in junk
filter.
It's not perfect, but you can train it to be more accurate. When you
see that it made a mistake, use the "Mark as Junk" or "Mark as Not Junk"
command to correct it.
For more info, read the MT-NW online manual:
<http://www.smfr.org/mtnw/docs/JunkFilter.html>
Thank you and others who have pointed this out. I could not believe that
MT-NewsWatcher was so inept at extrapolating my junk markings so
inappropriately.
It's only as good as you train it to be. Train it, and it will improve.
--
Please send all responses to the relevant news group. E-mail sent to
this address may be devoured by my very hungry SPAM filter. I do not
read posts from Google Groups. Use a real news reader if you want me to
see your posts.
JR
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Legitimate postings marked as junk?
- From: Warren Oates
- Re: Legitimate postings marked as junk?
- References:
- Legitimate postings marked as junk?
- From: Salmon Egg
- Re: Legitimate postings marked as junk?
- From: Wayne C. Morris
- Re: Legitimate postings marked as junk?
- From: Salmon Egg
- Legitimate postings marked as junk?
- Prev by Date: Re: Legitimate postings marked as junk?
- Next by Date: 2 software firewalls simultaneously?
- Previous by thread: Re: Legitimate postings marked as junk?
- Next by thread: Re: Legitimate postings marked as junk?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|