Re: Time machine interval
- From: danspam@xxxxxxx (Daniel Cohen)
- Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 22:58:12 +0000
Jolly Roger <jollyroger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <1ie0cax.29s6bn1uec1tiN%danspam@xxxxxxx>,
danspam@xxxxxxx (Daniel Cohen) wrote:
That's more than 99% true, but not 100%. I have run across a program
that rejected an admin name and password when run from a non-admin
account, but worked fine from an admin account. But such cases are very
rare, and I can see arguments for saying that a program that behaves
that way should not be used.
To which one(s) are you referring?
One of the earlier versions of ClamXav. The program worked fine from a
non-admin account, but if you tried to set up a schedule from a
non-admin account it asked for an admin name and password and then
rejected them. This was fixed in a later version.
It caused grief for quite a few of us, who wondered if we had mistyped
the password, or what was happening.
--
http://www.decohen.com
Send e-mail to the Reply-To address;
mail to the From address is never read
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Time machine interval
- From: Jolly Roger
- Re: Time machine interval
- References:
- Time machine interval
- From: Howard Brazee
- Re: Time machine interval
- From: Barry Margolin
- Re: Time machine interval
- From: Howard Brazee
- Re: Time machine interval
- From: Jolly Roger
- Re: Time machine interval
- From: Howard Brazee
- Re: Time machine interval
- From: Jolly Roger
- Re: Time machine interval
- From: Howard Brazee
- Re: Time machine interval
- From: Jolly Roger
- Re: Time machine interval
- From: Daniel Cohen
- Re: Time machine interval
- From: Jolly Roger
- Time machine interval
- Prev by Date: Re: Eject the DVD--Please!
- Next by Date: Re: Time machine interval
- Previous by thread: Re: Time machine interval
- Next by thread: Re: Time machine interval
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading