Re: Mail's "Bounce" feature
- From: Barry Margolin <barmar@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 20:19:01 -0500
In article <tacitr-D43D06.17463531032006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
tacit <tacitr@xxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <barmar-D78EC3.18554629032006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Barry Margolin <barmar@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
So? When the bounce gets back to the sender they can't tell how it was
generated.
Assuming that the bounce gets to the sender.
At session transaction time, the MX server knows who it's talking to.
So? Who it's talking to isn't usually the original sender.
Once the transaction has ended, that information has been lost; Mail
(and other servers, like Entourage server) do not any longer know who
initiated the transaction, and must rely on the header information in
the mail message.
Which, in the case of spam, is forged. Always.
If they're going to forge sender information, I assume they forge the
envelope as well. So it doesn't really matter whether the bounce is
sent by the MX server or the MUA. The only useful thing that can be
done during the SMTP session is for the MX server to return an error
code immediately rather than accepting the message, pushing the
responsibility for generating a bounce back to the sending MTA (which,
if it's a zombie doing direct delivery, will probably just ignore it).
But when there's mail forwarding involved, this won't happen.
But he wasn't talking about spam (in the post that started this
tangent), he was talking about legitimate mail that you want to send a
bounce to. He was talking about cases where you have good reason to
believe the sender information is valid. In this case, bouncing from
the MUA is fine.
His response said that such bounces "would not be accepted", and I
haven't seen him explain why not yet.
--
Barry Margolin, barmar@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Arlington, MA
*** PLEASE post questions in newsgroups, not directly to me ***
*** PLEASE don't copy me on replies, I'll read them in the group ***
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Mail's "Bounce" feature
- From: Jeffrey Goldberg
- Re: Mail's "Bounce" feature
- From: tacit
- Re: Mail's "Bounce" feature
- References:
- Re: Mail's "Bounce" feature
- From: tacit
- Re: Mail's "Bounce" feature
- Prev by Date: Re: modern apps for old wp and ss files
- Next by Date: Re: modern apps for old wp and ss files
- Previous by thread: Re: Mail's "Bounce" feature
- Next by thread: Re: Mail's "Bounce" feature
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|