Re: Why is Quicktime so *$^%&@# bad??!
- From: Davoud <star@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 18:25:33 -0500
Davoud:
> > I don't know whether the number will be five, nine, or 11, but the
> > answer is yes, there will continue to be competing video formats for
> > the forseeable future, and the owners of those formats will continue to
> > guard them jealously. Get used to it.
Justin:
> Either you're a defeatist, or you actually think this is a good thing
> (or you're such a fanatical apologist for Quicktime that you've painted
> yourself into a corner).
None of the above. Defeatist? I didn't know there was a war. What's
your role in this war? What are you doing to bring victory to a single
video standard for all computers? Other than ranting on Usenet, I mean.
> If the early developers of web browsers had
> your attitude, we would all be in trouble. How you can defend this is
> beyond me.
I didn't defend anything whatsoever. I merely stated what is true. What
a frustrating thing to be wrongly accused! What a frustrating thing to
read a reply from someone who didn't understand the article to which
they are replying!
Davoud
--
usenet *at* davidillig dawt com
.
- References:
- Re: Why is Quicktime so *$^%&@# bad??!
- From: Davoud
- Re: Why is Quicktime so *$^%&@# bad??!
- From: Justin
- Re: Why is Quicktime so *$^%&@# bad??!
- Prev by Date: Re: A Multi Billion Dollar Vision For Artists...
- Next by Date: Re: Simple Java compiler
- Previous by thread: Re: Why is Quicktime so *$^%&@# bad??!
- Next by thread: Re: Why is Quicktime so *$^%&@# bad??!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|