Re: A vertically integrated company should do better
- From: Snit <usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 10:08:46 -0700
Wally stated in post C70E40D0.105F%Wally@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 10/28/09 3:41 AM:
On 28/10/09 8:50 AM, in article C70CE367.5099E%usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
"Snit" <usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Tim Adams stated in post
teadams$2$0$0$3-C846F7.20462527102009@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on
10/27/09 5:46 PM:
What clause in the NDA do you think I likely violated?You might also note that merely stating that he is a beta tester for Apple,As I have noted: as I beta test for Apple I am under an NDA. What part ofI could start with why anyone would want a tester that has so much trouble
this baffles you?
reading a simple sentence as you obviously do Snit!
and under an NDA, that his mentioning that fact is very likely a violation
of
the NDA.
Oh.
You just made that up.
Once again just as I recently mentioned Snit...
You simply are incapable of understanding a simple sentence!
Where does Tim state that you *are* in violation of an NDA Snit!
Certainly not when he said...
".... is very likely a violation of the NDA."-Tim Adams
So what exactly are you claiming that Tim made up Snit?
Hint..
There is no fabrication in ....
"You might also note that merely stating that he is a beta tester for Apple,
and under an NDA, that his mentioning that fact is very likely a violation
of the NDA."-Tim Adams
What clause do you think I am *likely* violating?
Come on... you have said you agree with him... but neither of you are
willing to back up your claim. Of course, I ask what clause and you two
likely can only think of Santa. :)
Tim, you are just making more and more things up... ever since you were
busted lying about my having claimed I had my hard drive replaced. Heck,
you went so far as to claim the hard drive was replaced to - get this - fix
a *monitor* problem. You are technically incompetent and dishonest.
And now you want to push the idea that I acted dishonestly by going against
an agreement you have no access to. Gee, how funny is that.
Where did Tim state that you *did* act dishonestly by going against an
agreement Snit?
He and you have pushed that idea. Of course, neither of you have a shred of
evidence. Oh well. You are just running from the actual topic of what we
have been debating about:
<http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/6fe69d7b1c47143f>
Funny and pathetic.
As a self assessment Snit *that* is probably the most accurate thing you
have ever said!
(Do have fun being creative when you quote the above wont you Snit. LOL)
No need to be creative... I just speak the truth and watch you and your
clique buddies trip over each other in an effort to impress each other...
and then fail, as a group, to be able to make a valid point.
Are you ignorant enough to not see that?
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: A vertically integrated company should do better
- From: wetpixel
- Re: A vertically integrated company should do better
- From: Snit
- Re: A vertically integrated company should do better
- From: fibercut
- Re: A vertically integrated company should do better
- From: Snit
- Re: A vertically integrated company should do better
- From: Steve Carroll
- Re: A vertically integrated company should do better
- From: High Plains Thumper
- Re: A vertically integrated company should do better
- From: Snit
- Re: A vertically integrated company should do better
- From: Omar Murad Asfour
- Re: A vertically integrated company should do better
- From: Snit
- Re: A vertically integrated company should do better
- From: Omar Murad Asfour
- Re: A vertically integrated company should do better
- From: Snit
- Re: A vertically integrated company should do better
- From: Wally
- Re: A vertically integrated company should do better
- From: Snit
- Re: A vertically integrated company should do better
- From: Wally
- Re: A vertically integrated company should do better
- From: Snit
- Re: A vertically integrated company should do better
- From: Wally
- Re: A vertically integrated company should do better
- From: Snit
- Re: A vertically integrated company should do better
- From: Wally
- Re: A vertically integrated company should do better
- From: Tim Adams
- Re: A vertically integrated company should do better
- From: Snit
- Re: A vertically integrated company should do better
- From: Wally
- Re: A vertically integrated company should do better
- Prev by Date: Re: A vertically integrated company should do better
- Next by Date: Re: OT: I guess the media know we're watching...
- Previous by thread: Re: A vertically integrated company should do better
- Next by thread: Re: A vertically integrated company should do better
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|