Re: 2007 post on Apple Leopard: From Questionable problem to a clearly lame troll


"Fa-groon" <fa-groon@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:0001HW.C6E1047900073B98F01846D8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 05:46:05 -0700, Vincent wrote
(in article <cSJum.195331$sC1.71952@xxxxxxxxxxxx>):


"Fa-groon" <fa-groon@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:0001HW.C6E05D18002F1B8BF01846D8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 20:54:35 -0700, Vincent wrote
(in article <Z3Cum.57131$ec2.32189@xxxxxxxxxxxx>):


"Fa-groon" <fa-groon@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:0001HW.C6DFE3150012828FF01846D8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 14:05:42 -0700, Vincent wrote
(in article <J4wum.235363$vp.63823@xxxxxxxxxxxx>):


"Fa-groon" <fa-groon@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:0001HW.C6DFC463000B507DF01846D8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 06:11:13 -0700, Vincent wrote
(in article <K7pum.188464$O23.142482@xxxxxxxxxxxx>):


"Fa-groon" <fa-groon@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:0001HW.C6DED054000BA51DF01846D8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009 18:23:26 -0700, Vincent wrote
(in article <hMeum.233311$vp.23571@xxxxxxxxxxxx>):


"Fa-groon" <fa-groon@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:0001HW.C6DEB7F50005EEDAF01846D8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:50:26 -0700, Vincent wrote
(in article <Qwcum.64976$4t6.61285@xxxxxxxxxxxx>):


"-hh" <recscuba_google@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:0809cd71-e014-48cf-8bab-228cd2dc3389@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
co
m.
..
"Vincent" <Vvinc...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"-hh" <recscuba_goo...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Vincent" <Vvinc...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

FYI: my job and the job of others before me is to engage and
report.

That's the definition of a Shill.

So you can 'report' (to whomever) that this troll from Rotten
Apple
is
from a blog post that's nearly two years old, and no longer
relevant.

No, I don't report trolls. I simply gather information.

Sorry, but you most clearly said "report". See your above
statement.

Sorry, I write reports.

And by saying that you're not reporting trolls, all we know is
that
your reporting is of something other than trolls. What,
specifically,
is that?

I can't say.

Of course you can't. There is no "reporting". You're just zara
and
can't
admit that you were busted almost immediately. Time to disappear
and
re-invent another trolling personality to come back here with.
Better
luck
next time.


FYI: Your definition of Shill is in error. I am not advancing
or
promoting
anything only gathering information for our database.

But you did say "engage". To what end simply was not
specified.

You know, you stated it below, to gather information of a
social
nature.

Precisely what information are you collecting, for what entity,
for
what purpose?

Yes, I've made it a point to specifically ask. Not that I
really
expect an answer from you, since your 'predecessor' had failed
previously on this point. Once asked, you cannot ethically
refuse
to
provide disclosure.

Not to worry I'm not with law enforcement. I am part of a
socially
designed
experiment.

We want to know who you are with. We want proof. Otherwise
you're
just
zara.

Sorry, I can't say.



Of course you can't. You can't give out specific information on a
company
or
a job that does not exist. You're a liar. In fact, you're just
zara.

You are totally in error on all points even if I gave you an
organizational
name you would not find it. We are a private company funded to
perform
research. I am not a liar.



Bull***. You won't even tell us the purpose of this "research".
Certainly,
this "organization" has a purpose, and divulging that purpose would
not
threaten the "anonymity" of your "organization". But you can't even
do
that
because there is no purpose other than your own private, twisted
trolling,
zara.

Sorry I can't say.



Again. You are a liar and a troll.

No you are in error I am neither a liar or a troll. If you have proof
of
such a fact please show it. I predict that you will be unable to do so
as
the only evidence resides in the deepest recesses of your sick
delusional
mind..

I'll make a deal with you. You provide the proof I asked for earlier
about
how you (zara) or one of your sockpuppets "ran me off this newsgroup",
and
I'll supply the proof that you're a liar and a troll. And believe
me,mine
will be a much easier task than yours. No? I didn't think so.

The onus is on you not me you are the one making empty accusations. You
have absolutely no proof of what you claim none. Your ploy is proof that
you have no proof.



That's hilarious! I asked you first for your proof that I was "run off
this
newsgroup" at some point and you tell me that the onus of proof is on me!
Now, that's more like the old zara we all know and despise! (Not) Welcome
back! 8^)

As for you being a liar, since you can't provide proof that I was
"run-off"
this newsgroup, that statement was obviously a lie. That's proof that
you're
a liar.


It must have been a terrible blow to your ego when zara and his cronies ran
you out of this group so bad that you now skulk back here under an assumed
name. I feel pity for you you are so filled with hate and rage and self
loathing.


.