Re: The Windows registery - not very good
- From: Steve de Mena <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 22:48:55 -0700
GreyCloud wrote:
Steve de Mena wrote:GreyCloud wrote:Steve de Mena wrote:
Someone sent this out on Twitter today....
"Clean Up and Revive Your Bloated, Sluggish Mac"
http://lifehacker.com/5252183/clean-up-and-revive-your-bloated-sluggish-mac
And you still believe in fairy tales too I see.
Couldn't debate the points I made so you resorted to this, eh wintroll?
Oh the points like how Windows takes longer to startup with a large registry? Despite the fact that only a couple of keys are read during startup for specific bootup and startup items? (NOT "the whole registry")
Or the fact there is no "index file", when separate index files haven't been required with databases since probably 1985 (when your experience I think peaked)?
GUFFAW!!
Steve
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The Windows registery - not very good
- From: GreyCloud
- Re: The Windows registery - not very good
- From: Sermo Malifer
- Re: The Windows registery - not very good
- References:
- Re: The Windows registery - not very good
- From: Jesper
- Re: The Windows registery - not very good
- From: Steve de Mena
- Re: The Windows registery - not very good
- From: GreyCloud
- Re: The Windows registery - not very good
- From: Steve de Mena
- Re: The Windows registery - not very good
- From: GreyCloud
- Re: The Windows registery - not very good
- From: Steve de Mena
- Re: The Windows registery - not very good
- From: GreyCloud
- Re: The Windows registery - not very good
- From: Steve de Mena
- Re: The Windows registery - not very good
- From: GreyCloud
- Re: The Windows registery - not very good
- Prev by Date: Re: Hah hah: Windows 7 on netbooks: Only 3 programs running at one time
- Next by Date: Re: Found at M$ website in regards to OpenGL
- Previous by thread: Re: The Windows registery - not very good
- Next by thread: Re: The Windows registery - not very good
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|