Re: Good Microsoft TV ad!
- From: Steve de Mena <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 04:38:01 -0700
ZnU wrote:
In article <Jrudnem3yMdskXHUnZ2dnUVZ_rmdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Steve de Mena <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
ZnU wrote:In article <w5OdnfF_D5pR9XfUnZ2dnUVZ_oGdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,Wow, that techno gobbledygook is so convoluted it almost sounds believable.
Steve de Mena <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
ZnU wrote:Many poorly designed systems exist. If data for a specific account happens to end up cached in memory (where it gets corrupted) and is then retrieved (from the cache), modified, and committed, memory corruption could easily be propagated to disk.In article <proto-824DD7.13070718042009@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,That is all going to be in databases and transaction logged on disk. If that system would lose or corrupt data in the event of a memory failure (which still can occur with ECC), then it is a poorly designed system.
Walter Bushell <proto@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <znu-6AE894.14425416042009@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,For a bank database server which has 90% of its RAM full of critical account data, 365 days a year and 24 hours a day, this matters quite a bit, and I would encourage anyone choosing such a system to utilize ECC memory.
ZnU <znu@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <fZadnQCEC4WA6XrUnZ2dnUVZ_hadnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx>,How about inaccurate results, say a bit error in the high order field in a financial statement, or any bit in a flag in c which uses zero vs non zero as true vs. false? A bit error that makes someone's account balance negative instead of positive or vice versa?
GreyCloud <cumulus@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
As chip vendors improve their processes, the susceptibility should be reduced.What has already been proven? That quote doesn't comment at all about the subject of software bugs vs. hardware-level memory corruption.
The page does give an estimate for the frequency of memory corruption, however: roughly one bit error, per month, per gigabyte of memory. When one considers that the odds of a single-bit error leading to a program crash are fairly low, it's clear that the vast majority of crashes have absolutely nothing to do with the problem ECC solves.
Crashes are far from the worst errors.
If that actually seems like "convoluted gobbledygook" to you, you shouldn't be posting on this topic, because it was an almost ludicrously simple scenario.
I don't think you got the point, and that was connecting that scenario to ECC memory is ludicrous.
Steve
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Good Microsoft TV ad!
- From: GreyCloud
- Re: Good Microsoft TV ad!
- From: ZnU
- Re: Good Microsoft TV ad!
- References:
- Re: Good Microsoft TV ad!
- From: Preston
- Re: Good Microsoft TV ad!
- From: Steve de Mena
- Re: Good Microsoft TV ad!
- From: ZnU
- Re: Good Microsoft TV ad!
- From: GreyCloud
- Re: Good Microsoft TV ad!
- From: ZnU
- Re: Good Microsoft TV ad!
- From: GreyCloud
- Re: Good Microsoft TV ad!
- From: ZnU
- Re: Good Microsoft TV ad!
- From: GreyCloud
- Re: Good Microsoft TV ad!
- From: ZnU
- Re: Good Microsoft TV ad!
- From: Walter Bushell
- Re: Good Microsoft TV ad!
- From: ZnU
- Re: Good Microsoft TV ad!
- From: Steve de Mena
- Re: Good Microsoft TV ad!
- From: ZnU
- Re: Good Microsoft TV ad!
- From: Steve de Mena
- Re: Good Microsoft TV ad!
- From: ZnU
- Re: Good Microsoft TV ad!
- Prev by Date: Re: Good Microsoft TV ad!
- Next by Date: Re: Good Microsoft TV ad!
- Previous by thread: Re: Good Microsoft TV ad!
- Next by thread: Re: Good Microsoft TV ad!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|