Re: Apple Lags Behind On DVD-R/RWs?
- From: GreyCloud <cumulus@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 12:15:51 -0600
John Slade wrote:
If there is any more proof that Apple is lagging behind on it's novelty machines, just look at the Mini and the iMac. All models have 8x DVD-R/RW drives. Why don't they have 16x, 18x or even 20x DVD-R/RWs on their mainstream computers. Dell and HP have computers that are cheaper that come with faster drives. I'll tell you the reason, when you make a proprietary novelty machine, it's hard to upgrade to the next drive. Right now I can put a Blue-Ray player on a Dell or HP computer, do that with Apple's mainstream computers. To get a Blue-Ray player inside a Mini or iMac, you have to wait until Apple designs a new one, if they don't plan to drop the turkey that is. Your only choice is to buy a USB drive and that means more desk clutter which negates the main selling point of the Mini and iMac. The only Mac that has a newer DVD-R/RW is the Mac Pro and who is dumb enough to buy a $2500 machine just to get a better optical drive? For those who don't know, the reason the Mac Pro has a drive is because it has a big case where you can install an off the shelf drive in it easily.
Guffaw! Because the vendors can't put a reliable RW dvd out at those higher speeds, that's why.
--
"It is impossible to defeat an ignorant man in argument."
William G. McAdoo.
American Government official (1863-1941).
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Apple Lags Behind On DVD-R/RWs?
- From: John Slade
- Re: Apple Lags Behind On DVD-R/RWs?
- References:
- Apple Lags Behind On DVD-R/RWs?
- From: John Slade
- Apple Lags Behind On DVD-R/RWs?
- Prev by Date: Re: OS X Security Holes Galore Go Unpatched
- Next by Date: Re: Apple Lags Behind On DVD-R/RWs?
- Previous by thread: Re: Apple Lags Behind On DVD-R/RWs?
- Next by thread: Re: Apple Lags Behind On DVD-R/RWs?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
