Apple Lags Behind On DVD-R/RWs?
- From: "John Slade" <hhitman86@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 09:41:09 -0700
If there is any more proof that Apple is lagging behind on it's
novelty machines, just look at the Mini and the iMac. All models have 8x
DVD-R/RW drives. Why don't they have 16x, 18x or even 20x DVD-R/RWs on their
mainstream computers. Dell and HP have computers that are cheaper that come
with faster drives. I'll tell you the reason, when you make a proprietary
novelty machine, it's hard to upgrade to the next drive. Right now I can put
a Blue-Ray player on a Dell or HP computer, do that with Apple's mainstream
computers. To get a Blue-Ray player inside a Mini or iMac, you have to wait
until Apple designs a new one, if they don't plan to drop the turkey that
is. Your only choice is to buy a USB drive and that means more desk clutter
which negates the main selling point of the Mini and iMac. The only Mac that
has a newer DVD-R/RW is the Mac Pro and who is dumb enough to buy a $2500
machine just to get a better optical drive? For those who don't know, the
reason the Mac Pro has a drive is because it has a big case where you can
install an off the shelf drive in it easily.
John
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Apple Lags Behind On DVD-R/RWs?
- From: wetpixel
- Re: Apple Lags Behind On DVD-R/RWs?
- From: GreyCloud
- Re: Apple Lags Behind On DVD-R/RWs?
- From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Apple Lags Behind On DVD-R/RWs?
- From: Preston
- Re: Apple Lags Behind On DVD-R/RWs?
- From: ZnU
- Re: Apple Lags Behind On DVD-R/RWs?
- From: jon.in.durham
- Re: Apple Lags Behind On DVD-R/RWs?
- From: Snit
- Re: Apple Lags Behind On DVD-R/RWs?
- From: KDT
- Re: Apple Lags Behind On DVD-R/RWs?
- Prev by Date: Re: Apple's $500 or Microsoft's 81% tax?
- Next by Date: Re: Microsoft continues to re-enforce Apple marketing messages
- Previous by thread: Apple's $500 or Microsoft's 81% tax?
- Next by thread: Re: Apple Lags Behind On DVD-R/RWs?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|