Re: The grand success known as microsoftSF

Tim Adams stated in post
teadams$2$0$0$3-F3B0F7.15435516022009@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on
2/16/09 1:43 PM:

In article <JAhml.20521$Ws1.11715@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Steve Mackay <mackay.steve@xxxxxxx> wrote:

Snit wrote:
Wally stated in post C5BF551C.11C82%Wally@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 2/16/09 1:38
AM:

On 16/2/09 8:44 AM, in article C5BDF6F0.1F129%csma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
"Snit" <csma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

And Tim Adams did say that... thus showing he at least largely agrees
with
John.
The entire quote shows otherwise as previously explained!

"Why have you never posted what Tim said on the matter in it's entirety
Snit....

"I agree with you that MS getting _back_ into the retail business is very
likely due to Apple's success. But having had a retail presence once,
several years before Apple, and now saying they are _copying Apple_ is
very
misleading, since they are re-entering that area, not starting something
brand new that they had never done before."Tim Adams

It is clear that Tim is stating that Johns view that MS is copying Apple
"is
very misleading" so you are lying to suggest that Tim "largely agrees with
the position Steve Mackay was arguing against." because Tim has not
clarified what he thinks may have attributed toward "Apple's success", it
is
your assumption that in this case he is referring to Apple stores!"-Wally


And thus Tim Adams *disagrees* with Steve Mackay's contrary view...
or would if he had the ability to be consistent.
When looking at the whole of what Tim said he is totally consistent, it is
only your edited version of what he said that makes it appear otherwise!

But Tim Adams will not even try to be consistent... his game is to try to
rescue his co-trolls. So even though Tim Adams is on record saying he at
least mostly agrees with the position John made,
No Snit *you* are on record stating that on Tim's behalf, Tim has never
stated that!

If you were at all able to quote people in an honest manner you would see
that!

Both John and Tim Adams have said they believe MS is entering the retail
business at this time likely because of Apple's success.

another out and out LIE by michael glasser. so typical that he can't get
through
one post without one, or more lie.


Neither has denied
that MS had a retail business in the past, even before Apple did.

They are, essentially, in agreement, at least from what they have said.

Another lie - I am NOT in agreement with john, the person who claimed that MS
was copying Apple.


Steve Mackay, on the other hand, claimed John was wrong,


And john WAS WRONG, and has admitted it in a one line rant. Perhaps michale
glasser should learn to read.

which while the
John's opinion (and Tim's) has been shown to be a common on, it is not, in
my view, proved. OK. Disagreement is fine. But Mackay did not stop
there:
he claimed Apple was copying MS, which was an absurd claim.

Still confused about Microsoft opening a retail store before Apple? Such
simple concepts confuse you mikey. Are you *SURE* you're a teacher?

His teaching job is to teach pet rocks to roll over. so far his success rate
is
0% because he still has to help them get started.



Not even Mackay, of course, believed his claim: hence the reason he pulled
in off-topic debates about Wikipedia and his PDF forgery.

Now now mikey. I've never ONCE forged a PDF document. You have. It's
been proven beyond a shadow of a doubt. So stop lying about it.

nice how he tried to blame you for something he did and was caught at. typical
michael glasser.



You and others in
your "crew" jumped in to try to rescue Mackay, and since Mackay's claim was
so bizarre, you moved the goal posts to talking about who was *first* in
the
retail business.

Poor mikey, still lost after all these years. And STILL needs to lie in
nearly ever post he makes. What a pathetic existence you must lead.


Above you are *still* focusing on this moved goal post, pretending that Tim
Adams' noting this well established and non-controversial fact somehow
shows
he disagreed with John.

Mikey, the only goal posts that have been moved, have been by you.

You and John, from what you each have said, agree that MS is likely entering
the retail market because of Apple's success. Neither of you have shown any
belief that MS was not in the retail business first.

So where do you disagree with John in any substantial way?

And being that Steve Mackay claimed John was *wrong*, and that it is Apple
who copied MS (note: not just entered the retail business later, but
*copied* MS), how do you claim to do anything other than disagree with Steve
Mackay's contradictory position?

And Tim Adams is about to try to twist things and run from his own stated
views... and *nobody* shall believe a word he says. Not even your
co-trolls, Tim, but they will pretend they do... that is just how your crew
"rolls."


--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: The grand success known as microsoftSF
    ... By what measure was microsoftSF a success? ... At what point did the Apple stores become a "far-reaching and wildly ... Wally, Tim Adams, Steve Carroll and - to a lesser extent - Steve Mackay ... Even john admitted as much. ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: The grand success known as microsoftSF
    ... By what measure was microsoftSF a success? ... At what point did the Apple stores become a "far-reaching and wildly ... Wally, Tim Adams, Steve Carroll and - to a lesser extent - Steve Mackay ... Even john admitted as much. ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: The grand success known as microsoftSF
    ... "I agree with you that MS getting _back_ into the retail business is very ... several years before Apple, and now saying they are _copying Apple_ is ... It is clear that Tim is stating that Johns view that MS is copying Apple ... least mostly agrees with the position John made, ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: The grand success known as microsoftSF
    ... a title "Microsoft - Still Copying Apple After All These Years". ... is very likely due to Apple's success. ... Even john admitted as much. ... because Tim has not ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: The grand success known as microsoftSF
    ... several years before Apple, and now saying they are _copying Apple_ is ... It is clear that Tim is stating that Johns view that MS is copying Apple ... least mostly agrees with the position John made, ... It's absolutely amazing that Snit has claimed to have used things that you ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)