Re: Fear Inbalanced: John Stewart On Faux News

Steve Mackay wrote:
Rhino Plastee wrote:
Steve Mackay wrote:
Rhino Plastee wrote:
bushlyed wrote:
On Jan 24, 9:30 am, Steve Carroll <fretw...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 24, 7:23 am, "John" <nos...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:





<waynesnoches...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:160d21c1-d461-454d-b49a-390540c51c13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Only days into the Obama adiminstration, these gems are showing
up on Faux News.
There is a You-Tube broadcast of this but I don't have the
link. They showed Obama taking the oath of office for the
second time. The converation went like this:
"He didn't have his hand on the bible."
"Is he really President?"
Could you imagine a legitimate news organization saying that?
A legitimate news organization would know there there is no
Consitutional requirement for the President to have a bible
when taking the oath of office.
Indeed, a legitimate news organization would know that the oath
of office goes like this: I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that
I will . . .
It indeed says "swear (or affirm)." So the President can say I
do solemnly affirm if he is non-religious or does not believe
in swearing on the bible.
One of the Faux's miss americas said this: "I find it highly
entertaining that only twenty-four hours or less, we are
already talking about stuff like this" meaning attacking
Barack Obama. Just the opposite. I find it highly entertaining
that they waited twenty-four hours.
Finally Bill O'Liely said: I didn't like the line in the speech
about "we don't have to compromise our values
for to protect ourselves." Sometimes we do.
To which Jon Stewart replied: If you don't stick to your values
when they are being tested, they aren't values, they're
hobbies.
There is one guy around here named Steve Carroll who spends all
day trolling while drinking beer, growing his pot belly, and
listening to that favorite right wing nutjob "news source", Faux
News.
Why aren't you and Snit calling for Obama's impeachment yet,
John? You're aware that he ordered an attack in Pakistan, right?
You're aware that the U.S. has not formally declared war on
Pakistan, right? You're aware that the U.N. charter doesn't
sanction the U.S. attacking Pakistan, right? These were the
reasons you were calling for Bush's impeachment. Why the legal
double standard for Obama?
Obama is not attacking Pakistan

He is attacking IDENTIFIABLE Al-Queda targets which we as a nation
have an absolute right to do

I for one never complaint about Bush doing that, only that he did
not do that more often and wasted precious time, money, material
and lives on his precious little Iraqi war rather than getting the
people who attacked us on 9/11
Steve ***-head Carroll is looking at the UN Charter where it
specifically talkes about Pakistan when he should be looking to see
where it says a nation has the fucking right to defend itself. Only a
fucked up *** like Steve Carroll would try to argue
Obama should be impeached because he is working to defend the
nation. I bet Steve Carroll was never in the military.
I'm absolutely positive that you haven't been in the military as
well, Snit.

And before you ask, no, your sockpuppet army doesn't count as
military.

Do you ever think before you post you fucking ***? If you had
looked at the From line you would not have to shove a sock in your
drooling mouth.

Cut the *** Snit. You're not fooling anyone.

Shove your post up your ass ***.


.