Re: More lies from Wally

On 1/1/09 11:29 AM, in article C5817888.E799E%usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
"Snit" <usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"Wally" <Wally@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> stated in post
C582503A.EF58%Wally@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 12/31/08 6:49 PM:

On 1/1/09 12:49 AM, in article C580E27D.E7823%usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
"Snit" <usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"Wally" <Wally@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> stated in post
C5814FF5.EECE%Wally@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 12/31/08 12:36 AM:

On 31/12/08 3:59 PM, in article
C580666A.E775C%usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
"Snit" <usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

<snip>

You keep running from the question:

What is your problem with my noting the absurdity of someone
saying they agree with parts of something they claimed to not
agree with "at all"?

Come on, Wally... stop running.

There would be nothing wrong in anyone doing as you suggest Snit, however
in
your case there is no good example of you doing such a thing!

Incorrect. That is what you claimed to have a problem with. So what is
your problem with it?

"It" ... being you showing the absurdity of someone saying they agree with
parts of something they claimed to not agree with "at all simply does not
exist Snit, so in as much as "It" is merely one of your delusions I have no
problem with "It"... You do!

You are babbling. The question:

What is your problem with my noting the absurdity of someone
saying they agree with parts of something they claimed to not
agree with "at all"?

http://tinyurl.com/8o5f9j

"Just about now you are ready to make one of your ....... 'what are you
babbling about' posts with a heavy dose of obfuscation thrown in for good
measure, you are *that* predictable Snit!"-Wally

Asking a question repeatedly *after* it has been answered is basic
obfuscation!

That was way too easy Snit! .... See what happens when you continue to make
piss poor choices? LOL



.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: More lies from Wally
    ... What is your problem with my noting the absurdity of someone ... saying they agree with parts of something they claimed to not ... exist Snit, so in as much as "It" is merely one of your delusions I have no ... quote the comment that Tim Adams made it is always in an abbreviated form.. ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: More lies from Wally
    ... What is your problem with my noting the absurdity of someone ... saying they agree with parts of something they claimed to not ... exist Snit, so in as much as "It" is merely one of your delusions I have no ... Do you deny that Tim Adams said the two were "identical"? ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: Why set theory / math is important
    ... What you 'noted' was as usual at odds with reality Snit .... ... What is at "odds with reality" to note the absurdity of someone saying they ... So where is your problem with my noting the absurdity of someone saying they ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: Why set theory / math is important
    ... What you 'noted' was as usual at odds with reality Snit .... ... "What is at "odds with reality" to note the absurdity of someone saying they ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: Why set theory / math is important
    ... What you 'noted' was as usual at odds with reality Snit .... ... "What is at "odds with reality" to note the absurdity of someone saying they ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)