Re: The responsibility dodge that keep coming back

On Dec 16, 6:21 pm, Tim Adams <teadams$2$0$...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <a8e8b575-9389-4de6-a3b9-83fb8ff44...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,



 -hh <recscuba_goo...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Snit <use...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"-hh" <recscuba_goo...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> stated:
Snit wrote:

The above is in error... looking at the whole sentence that is not what
your meaning was... my apologies.

Gosh, imagine that.

And yes, your other post was also in error too.

That makes you "Zero for two" (at least) in less than 15 minutes.

 Dude... I made a mistake and apologized... but you *still* said:

    the PDFs are still represent a forgery

Which they certainly do not!  

See Tim, this is what I meant about "par for the course", and why
Michael doesn't deserve the
time of day:  by the above, he just undid his own retraction, which
restored one of his mistakes.

And by his attempts to ambitiously get back onto his personal axe to
grind, he's once again dodged taking responsibility for his errors,
despite ample opportunity to be honest.  Which unfortunately also
means that by pointing this one yet again, we can all "Bet the Ranch"
that Glasser will respond to claim innocence and some flavor of
"victim-itis", promulgating more of his dishonest view of reality, in
10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 4, 3, 2, 1 ...

Because he can't simply not respond.

It is indeed 'par for the course'. Poor michael still can't figure out that
those of us that accused him, and correctly so, of forging a pdf document, were
talking about the document from several years ago, knowing full well that once a
person has been proved to forge pdf file, it wasn't worth wasting our time to
look at new file that same person might post. Especially when he seems to be  
mainly keeping his web site just to gather info on the visitors, as he has shown
on several occasions.

Exactly... and what I wrote in this thread proves I was talking about
the PDF that involved Steve Mackay and Sandman.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: The responsibility dodge that keep coming back
    ...     the PDFs are still represent a forgery ... those of us that accused him, and correctly so, of forging a pdf document, were ... person has been proved to forge pdf file, it wasn't worth wasting our time to ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: email invoices
    ... I no longer hear the "I never received your invoice" excuse anymore. ... I use Adobe Acrobat's Print to Pdf, ... the spam and faxes getting lost by way of paper jam or other screw up. ... Michael Gailey ...
    (alt.machines.cnc)
  • Re: PDF of "Golden Past, Red Future" now available to download
    ... (To reply please take the michael) ... anyone "sharing" their PDF is still helping us ...
    (uk.sport.football.clubs.liverpool)
  • printing or postscript probs
    ... PDF which I can print no problem. ... non-working case but not the working case. ... Thanks, Michael ... (PID 30238) ...
    (Debian-User)
  • Re: Viewing PDFs in Safari without Acrobat
    ... 0001HW.C04DEBB900221C48F02B4550@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Michael H. ... I've got Tiger but, as I've removed the Acrobat plug-in, Safari downloads ... pdf that I point it at. ... The PDF option's disabled in my Quicktime preferences. ...
    (uk.comp.sys.mac)