Re: OT: The Uncounted

Snit wrote:

"Maveric" <Maveric@xxxxxxx> stated in post
a4OdnS-9g_-CcpjUnZ2dnUVZ_sninZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx on 10/27/08 9:51 AM:

Snit wrote:

"Maveric" <Maveric@xxxxxxx> stated in post
O7WdnST7gZ6ja5nUnZ2dnUVZ_t3inZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx on 10/26/08 4:09 PM:

Snit wrote:

<http://www.uncountedthemovie.com/trailer.html>
-----
"Nearly all the experts are in agreement that the exit polls
could not have been so far off that they gave such distorted
results. It's far more rational to assume that the voting
process was compromised."

"When you see 42%, 70% and 80% undervotes in a precinct in
this election, you know that's not real. There's something
desperately not right."

"Election 2006 gives us no reason to assume that our
elections are now being run fairly and honestly. Just the
opposite. Look at the pattern of the last few elections. We
have every reason to believe that the 2008 election is going
to be manipulated."
-----

There is clearly good reason to doubt the honesty of the US election
process. Why have things not changed in any significant way since
2004?

Then there is Diebolds corrupt voting machines.

That is a large part of the problem... a problem many will not even
acknowledge.

By the way: some time back you predicted that Clinton would become
president
and I poo-poo'd that idea as completely unlikely. Time has proved us
both wrong: you in saying she was already selected and me in saying that
her
chances were so slim. So be it... neither of us is perfect. :)




It is hard to keep up with what the Bilderberg group is doing. They
originally wanted Hilliary, but for some reason she was later pushed
aside
for McCain. Considering the millions that Obama is getting from wall
street, it looks like another rich elite has joined the fray in funding
who
they want. But in the beginning, it was Hilliary... now I have heard
that
they've selected McCain. I think these people have our downfall in mind.

I found a very interesting book, an New York Times best seller, called
"The
Rise of the Fourth Reich". It makes sense, considering the stuff I used
see in the CommCenters concerning latin american Nazis. The most
important chapter was about the ratlines that the Nazis used to get out
of germany to
argentina. Looks like Prescott Bush was involved as well. Very
interesting read, and the best parts are the latest declassification of
some WWII documents concerning our efforts to develop the A bomb. We
were
lied to and big time. We didn't have enough fissionable material in 1945
to test the theory... we got three nukes from the germans that had
already
used them on the eastern front. All we did was strip the paint off their
bombs and repaint them. An odd remark by one of the lead scientists when
he was asked about using the uranium bomb on Japan that hasn't been
tested
and he said "Don't worry, the Germans already tested them". :-/


I would love to see info on that... really.



Hmmm... my only suggestion is to buy the book "The Rise of the Fourth
Reich". by Jim Marrs. ISBN 978-0-06-124558-9


According to him, and other researchers mentioned in the book, that this
info only became available around 2000. A memo sent to FDR from Los Alamos
said that they didn't have enough fissionable material to make a bomb and
would take some time. Another problem they had was that the fuses needed
to work in under 1/3000 of a second and in synchronization and they didn't
have anything reliable at that time. The germans had them tho. What
really bothers me is that we were lied to yet again.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: OT: The Uncounted
    ... "Election 2006 gives us no reason to assume that our ... some WWII documents concerning our efforts to develop the A bomb. ... to elevate the Linux desktop to the point where it is as good or better than ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: OT: The Uncounted
    ... "Election 2006 gives us no reason to assume that our ... chapter was about the ratlines that the Nazis used to get out of germany to ... some WWII documents concerning our efforts to develop the A bomb. ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: Expense of Manhattan Project delaying wars end?
    ... bomb was fear the Germans were doing exactly that. ... good reason not to scrap the project and say, ...
    (soc.history.war.world-war-ii)
  • Re: David Owen
    ... that MP's majority -- it drops at every election. ... We can clearly see the analogy with seats and votes, ... match there is no technical reason ...
    (uk.politics.electoral)
  • Re: Time to scrap SETI?
    ... intelligent life evolved anywhere else until now. ... >>clear why this would occur as there is no obvious reason for conquest ... >>The US spent $65 million to interfere in the Ukrainian election. ... >>Foreign involvement of any kind in a US election is a crime. ...
    (sci.space.policy)