Re: The Wintrolls love to talk about the filings...

In article <s6nrd4lmrebvck958fd9598v13dviimn1c@xxxxxxx>,
Mayor of R'lyeh <mayor.of.rlyeh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Sat, 27 Sep 2008 09:02:36 +0200, Sandman <mr@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

In article <8vkrd4pijm446ip08saq8820bduni59m40@xxxxxxx>,
Mayor of R'lyeh <mayor.of.rlyeh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I realize that English is a second language to you, Clyde, so I'm
going to take this slowly.

LOL! Do it real slowly

Of course.

Try not to say 'Bork! Bork! Bork! too many times. 8)


Claiming that Wintrolls (plurals) love to talk about filings (plurals)
isn't invalidated by finding a Wintroll (singularis) talk about a
filing (singularis), especially when the one doing the finding was
specifically asked to find one (singularis) case.

We've moved on from that.

No you haven't, which is why I educated you on English. You're welcome.

LOL! Your claiming that providing a singular proves a plural only
served to show that you are grossly overconfident in your
understanding of English.
Of course I strongly suspect that in Swedish saying 'There's one item'
doesn't back up the claim that there was more than one item either. I
could be wrong, but I think this has more to do with you being a
partisan hack who wil say anything to defend a fellow Maccie than it
does linguistics.

Alan did indeed find one. But he still has
to back up both his orignal claim (multiple 'Wintrolls' doing this)

Only if someone would be stupid enough to pretend that there hasn't
been lots of Wintrolls that do this on a regular basis.

The claim has been made multiple times. So far the proof is lacking.
Or do you think that making the claim several times automatically
makes it true?


and and his subsequent claims (that Edwin and I 'love' to do this
among others)

And that the sky is blue, of course.

I have seen Alan make no such claim.


Of course, Alan himself headed for the tall grass hours ago. Its nice
to see that the guy who holds his coat and purse when Alan gets all
huffy is sticking up for him though. 8)

Yeah, we both enjoy making fun of you until your nose start bleeding.

This might be a big yuck generator in Sweden but it just looks like a
non-sequitur elsewhere.

Oops, here's a tissue.

Does Alan allow you to get in his purse like that?

And not even you can be so blind and have such a convenient memory to
try to forget the numerous times Edwin and his group of wannabe's have
brought up law suits against Apple. Not even you.

LOL! This from a Maccie. Maccies start screaming 'Prove it!' whenever
anyone claims that a Maccie ever did anything that everyone damn well
knows they did.

Hahaha! I know you really like to lie about other people, but aren't
you being just a little too obvious now, Clyde?

Of course you're using the Maccie's definition of 'lie' which is - to
point out a truth that you'd rather not acknowledge.


Since this proof is supposedly so abundant I'm sure
you won't have any trouble supplying it by the truckload.

You have to first explicitly claim that you are so outrageously stupid
as to claim that Edwin (for instance - to add another wintroll on top
of zara which has already been mentioned) hasn't made a lot of posts
about Apple law suits. Because I am having real trouble imagining that
even you are this numbingly stupid, Clyde.

So I take it that this is a tacit admission that you simply cannot
back up your claims.

I take your statement as tacit admission that you don't have the balls
to clearly state your only implied counterclaim...



And lets not forget that bringing up news related to Apple in a Mac
newsgroup isn't exactly a sign of 'love' as Alan claims.

Ah, semantics, your last resort when you realise that you have nothing
that backs up your lies. :-D

See above. Don't worry, Sandy. There's plenty of room in the tall
grass. I'm sure Alan saved you a spot. 8)

Here are just a few examples...

<http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/f986686fc7d14b4
d>

<http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/5954d04693f1518
b>

<http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/7c50079a753e545
9>

<http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/def63bc3315ed10
8>

<http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3f8263b78402c53
0>

Do you notice anything these examples have in common.

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
<http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: The Wintrolls love to talk about the filings...
    ... LOL! ... Try not to say 'Bork! ... I have seen Alan make no such claim. ... Muslim, ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: The Wintrolls love to talk about the filings...
    ... Try not to say 'Bork! ... Only if someone would be stupid enough to pretend that there hasn't ... I have seen Alan make no such claim. ... you being just a little too obvious now, Clyde? ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: OT/ Lower than a Snakes Belly
    ... >>i have found that most people that usually think they are smarter than ... lol no - sorry i asked if he had a job. ... I hardly ever read her posts and at this point i dont know why. ... but hey lol what ever Alan. ...
    (alt.support.diabetes)
  • Re: I love this newsgroup
    ... |>what do you think i would wish on you Alan if it wasnt me that made the ... Danni and I went to a place here called T.G.I. Fridays for lunch today. ... They even had New York Style Cheesecake ... LOL The guy said it tasted like cardboard. ...
    (alt.support.diabetes)
  • Re: Jerrys Breakdown (In The Presence of God)
    ... lol cause he really didn't make ... I used to see Alan around the mean streets of Tustin at least a couple times ... a month for a couple of years, usually in the hardware store next door to ...
    (rec.music.makers.guitar.jazz)