Re: Pratt-fall being an ***.. ..again.

In article <ab811$4899be92$30684@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Edwin"
<thorne25@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

Sandman:
Brian (falsely) claimed the post was from California

Edwin:
Anthony Minkoff also said the ISP in question is in
California.

Sandman:
Anthony Minkoff also falsely claimed that Brian was correct,
yes.

Edwin:
Anthony just did a whois on the IP address,
the same as MuahMan did. Niether made false claims.

Sandman:
Both claims were incorrect, and as such, false.

Edwin:
Calling it false for MuahMan's post, without also saying it came
from New York, was to give the false impression it did come from
him.

Huh? The claim that it came from California was incorrect. Me stating
the correct answer does in no way imply that it was posted by Brian. I
have no idea whether it was posted by Brian.

Sandman:
and Alan asked Brian how he knew that.

Edwin:
Why didn't Anthony need to ask?

Sandman:
Why are you asking me and not Anthony?

Edwin:
To make you realize how MuahMan knew that.

Sandman:
What Brian "knew" is irrelevant, it was in error.

Edwin:
Yet you only chose to call him "false." Not "in error." "False."

false (adjective)
not according with truth or fact; incorrect

I am saying that what he said was not according to truth or fact, it
was incorrect.

Edwin:
Alan only asked to make it seem that it couldn't be known
the post came from California, to justify his remark in the
first line of this post.

Sandman:
The post didn't come from California, it came from New York.

Edwin:
It didn't come from Florida.

Sandman:
Which is a prerequisite of it coming from New York.

Edwin:
Coming from Florida would be a prerequisite of it coming from
MuahMan.

Brian can't post posts from any other place? You're the one who keeps
dragging in Brian here, I don't care about him.

--
Sandman[.net]
.