Re: OT: Steve Carroll begs to go to jail

"Steve Carroll" <trollkiller@xxxxxx> stated in post
trollkiller-DB0C06.11411809062008@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 6/9/08 10:41 AM:

In article <C472B803.BF0C8%usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Snit <usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"Steve Carroll" <trollkiller@xxxxxx> stated in post
trollkiller-A50C0A.11314409062008@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 6/9/08 10:31 AM:

(snip)

Yawn... as I said previously, in my opinion you did harass Elizabot
based on gender.

And yet you cannot quote a single quote of mine where I have *ever* done so.

....
--begin quote of you--
Now there may be some evidence to say that Elizabot has problems with
men, or at least with what is considered "normal" relationships. Here
are some quotes from her:

To George Graves:
"I haven't totally decided "better dead than wed", but guys like you
make me think "better an unwed mother than put up with your bull***."

She clearly is not the type to settle down... not a problem by me, but
she does seem to show some hostility toward men there.
--end quote--


What you're claiming is 'clear' here is total BS.

As shown by? Come on, Steve, support your BS!

Explain how this isn't a *bogus* attack based on gender for the purpose
of harassing her any time you'd like, Snit. Oops!!

Show where it is bogus. Now don't expect me to get sucked into a discussion
about her... I have repeatedly proved my claims and you can find the proof
in the Google archive. I shan't talk about her in any detail, no matter how
much you beg me to.

Or this, by you:
"I do not owe her an apology of any sort, other than to say that I
*might* have mischaracterized her obvious obsession when I stated it was
based on sexual or lustful feelings. It is possible that it was not".

This is an outrageous admission to an outrageous lie by you.

As shown by? Keep in mind my claims were 100% proved. If *anyone* wants a
copy of the proof all they need to do is email me... I still have the PDF
with all the links... but I shan't be pulled into a public debate about her
by you.

You are seen here clearly recognizing Elizabot as a female while
simultaneously talking about your statement that her *alleged* obsession was
"based on sexual or lustful feelings" for you. This can only be seen as an
attempt by you to humiliate her... what could possibly be more humiliating
than the suggestion that she had "sexual or lustful feelings" for you?

Again: if anyone wants the proof they can email me. I will send the PDF
quickly. I shan't be pulled into a debate about her in a public forum.

So far you keep insisting I have lied but you cannot find a *single*
example.

There is a bunch of this sort of thing by you... spread all over the
google archive... so report away, moron... you'll have your ass smeared
all over the media as the lunatic "teacher" who couldn't comprehend his
actions on usenet.

The fact you dishonestly accuse me of sexual harassment may very well get
you into jail, Steve.

And, yes, if the law passes I will press charges for these actions of yours
and others.


--
If A = B and B = C, then A = C, except where void or prohibited by law.
Roy Santoro, Psycho Proverb Zone (http://snipurl.com/BurdenOfProof)





.