Re: Macs not used in business?
- From: Steve Carroll <trollkiller@xxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2008 15:45:09 -0600
In article <J-KdnQwfNvCax9XVnZ2dnUVZ_h_inZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
"PC Guy" <pcguy@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Alan Baker" <alangbaker@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:alangbaker-4EE64B.08585005062008@[74.223.185.199.nw.nuvox.net]...
In article <6d82a$4847f824$9904@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Lurky <hidden@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Alan Baker wrote:
In article <56udndJdqobtA9rVnZ2dnUVZ_srinZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Steve de Mena <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Alan Baker wrote:
In article <X62dnWn6yqwVZtvVnZ2dnUVZ_uadnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Steve de Mena <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Alan Baker wrote:You didn't say that.
In article <MJOdnUD9DPUCt9vVnZ2dnUVZ_obinZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,I also said I don't buy the "$100,000 for 25 people". So how can
Steve de Mena <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Alan Baker wrote:Your only argument that this isn't a credible account is that the
Tell it to these guys:There is no such thing as a "Windows XP terminal server".
"Many smart shops I chat with are dumping their Windows machines
for
Macs. Take Jaffe Associates, a Washington, D.C., marketing and
business-strategy consultancy. This 25-person firm recently
unplugged
its traditional Windows server architecture to install a similar
system
from none other than Apple.
The company considered upgrading its aging Windows XP terminal
server
but endured Microsoft sticker shock when it calculated the cost
of
deploying collaborative software: Chief Operating Officer Shani
Magosky
got a quote for $100,000.
Then she priced Apple technology for same functionality and found
she
could build a similar system for about half the price."
<http://money.cnn.com/2008/05/29/smallbusiness/macs_small_biz.fsb/i
nde
x.
h
tm>
reporter didn't use the correct term?
you
say this is my "only argument".
Yes he did:
Steve:
""There is no such thing as a "Windows XP terminal server".
$100,000 for 25 people?? No sale."
Message ID: <MJOdnUD9DPUCt9vVnZ2dnUVZ_obinZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
You're caught lying again, Alan.
Sorry, but me not interpreting Steve's implication correctly is not me
lying, Edwin.
It's for two users maximum, for remote assistance. And it is NOTIf it is demonstrated that a reporter has already gotten one factFact: there is a terminal server program/service that one can use
wrong (the "Windows XP terminal server") how can we trust the other
facts reported?
with
Windows XP.
called "Windows XP Terminal Server".
I didn't say "included with", now did I? I said "can be used with".
Do you think they were running their company on that?
Nope.
You're still basing your critique on the fact that he didn't call the
product by its Proper Name, but then, he didn't present it as a Proper
Name, did he? Neither "terminal" nor "server" were capitalized.
Why do you keep repeating that lie when Steve already made it quite
clear his main "critique" is that Windows licensing for 25 people
wouldn't cost $100,000?
He hasn't indicated that that is his main critique. Note he wrote "I
also said", not "I'm mostly basing it on the"
Everyone else was able to figure it out. Why not you? Never mind...I forgot
who I was replying to
I think he kf'd you, Eddie.
--
"Apple is pushing how green this is - but it [Macbook Air] is
clearly disposable... when the battery dies you can pretty much
just throw it away". - Snit
.
- References:
- Macs not used in business?
- From: Alan Baker
- Re: Macs not used in business?
- From: Steve de Mena
- Re: Macs not used in business?
- From: Alan Baker
- Re: Macs not used in business?
- From: Steve de Mena
- Re: Macs not used in business?
- From: Alan Baker
- Re: Macs not used in business?
- From: Steve de Mena
- Re: Macs not used in business?
- From: Alan Baker
- Re: Macs not used in business?
- From: Lurky
- Re: Macs not used in business?
- From: Alan Baker
- Re: Macs not used in business?
- From: PC Guy
- Macs not used in business?
- Prev by Date: Re: Macs not used in business?
- Next by Date: Re: Macs not used in business?
- Previous by thread: Re: Macs not used in business?
- Next by thread: Alan Baker caught lying again! [was Re: Macs not used in business?]
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|