Re: Now that's monopoly power...
- From: Lurky <hidden@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 15:15:50 -0500
MuahMan wrote:
On May 31, 3:23 pm, Lurky <hid...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Alan Baker wrote:In article <7409d$48419eee$4...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,I don't see how that follows from what I wrote.
Lurky <hid...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Alan Baker wrote:By that same argument, why should object if someone robs a bank...In article <a4d86$48419bd3$3...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,Why should I object having software compatible with the next iteration
Lurky <hid...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Alan Baker wrote:Why don't you find it objectionable that a company can't just get<http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&Naturally if you write a driver for an operating system, you must follow
articleId=9091618&source=rss_news50>
'May 31, 2008 (Computerworld) Microsoft Corp. will require hardware
makers to test their device drivers on Windows 7 to receive
certification for Windows Vista, according to documents posted on the
company's site.
In a long explanation (download PDF)of the Windows Logo Program,
Microsoft spelled out the new requirement. "Beginning with the release
of the first beta of the next operating system, all Windows Vista client
and Windows Server 2008 submissions must include a complete [set of]
test logs for the new beta OS," the company said in the document.'
IOW, it doesn't matter what you, the hardware maker want, you'll do it
Microsoft's way.
the requirements of that system and test it for proper operation and
compatibility.
Why do you find that objectionable?
certification for Windows Vista?
of Windows before it arrives?
...provided that you get a cut of the proceeds?
That whole debacle was caused by hardware makers not testing theirPerhaps that whole debacle is why hardware makers might be reluctant toWhy do they have to involve themselvesTo avoid a repeat of the XP to Vista transition problems.
in Microsoft's software development effort for a product that Microsoft
may never deliver?
do the work required to test an OS that may never see the light of day...
software for Vista compatibility in spite of having years to get ready.
I don't see why you're in favor of a repeat of that.
If the hardware makers don't like it, they can promote another OS. Too
bad Apple won't let that be OSX.
--
** Posted fromhttp://www.teranews.com**- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Poor Alan. So quick to resort to childish insults and crank calling
family members when he is beaten like a rented mule in every argument.
Did you see how he snipped away the whole last part of my post when he answered it? The part that starts "That whole debacle..."
Why was that too hard for him to answer to?
--
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
.
- References:
- Now that's monopoly power...
- From: Alan Baker
- Re: Now that's monopoly power...
- From: Lurky
- Re: Now that's monopoly power...
- From: Alan Baker
- Re: Now that's monopoly power...
- From: Lurky
- Re: Now that's monopoly power...
- From: Alan Baker
- Re: Now that's monopoly power...
- From: Lurky
- Re: Now that's monopoly power...
- From: MuahMan
- Now that's monopoly power...
- Prev by Date: Roku Netflix Box Arrived Today
- Next by Date: Re: Which customer gets the gravey?
- Previous by thread: Re: Now that's monopoly power...
- Next by thread: Re: Now that's monopoly power...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|