Re: HELP IS ON THE WAY maccies.



Alan Baker wrote:
In article <65eb5$4841a0d5$5668@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Lurky <hidden@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Alan Baker wrote:
In article <3047c$48419cd1$4246@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Lurky <hidden@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Alan Baker wrote:
In article <26fe$48419a4b$2978@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Lurky <hidden@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Alan Baker wrote:
In article <6672$484196ac$2043@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Lurky <hidden@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Sandman wrote:
In article <91512$48419147$31007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Lurky
<lurky@hidden@all.times> wrote:
I undid your insertion of someone else's name and email address.

The zara:
God! How does Apple do it? A brand new OS every month.
Sandman:
It's pretty amazing. What's MS interval? A patch every six years? Yeah, that's about it. You're still wainting for that brand new
os. :P
Is it a good idea to answer a foolish statement by trying to make an
even more foolish one?
Yeah, how's that working out for you?
Have I said something foolish?

Why did you edit my post? Are you trying to tell me you're a troll who's not worth bothering with?
He didn't edit your post.
What changed my name and email address then? Some strange bug in Mac news readers?
The text that with Edwin's name and email address didn't replace any text from your post.
It replaced what should have said "Lurky <hidden@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:"
Which wasn't in your post.
Yes it was. He replaced it.

No it wasn't.

Quote the entire text of your post and show me where it said:

"In article [insert article number],
Lurky <hidden@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:"

It was text he *added* to his post.
Why did you deny he edited the post when you know he added text to it?
He edit his post, not yours. He also did not edit any words that were in your post.
What kind of game are you playing? He edited the post to put in another person's name and address.

That he added that text rather than the name "Lurky" along with its associated fake email address is his choice.
As it was your choice to deny his editing of the post even though you knew he had edited it.
He didn't edit your post.
Yes he did.

Nope.

And I agree with it.
You agree with falsifying posts? Why?
I agree that you are another Edwin sockpuppet.
Good for you.

Are you and Sandman playing together in the same sandbox? Just curious.

LOL

Okay, that's enough. I'll be ignoring you from now on.

--












** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: HELP IS ON THE WAY maccies.
    ... Lurky wrote: ... even more foolish one? ... He didn't edit your post. ... Are you and Sandman playing together in the same sandbox? ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: HELP IS ON THE WAY maccies.
    ... Lurky wrote: ... even more foolish one? ... He didn't edit your post. ... I agree that you are another Edwin sockpuppet. ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: HELP IS ON THE WAY maccies.
    ... Lurky wrote: ... even more foolish one? ... He didn't edit your post. ... I agree that you are another Edwin sockpuppet. ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: HELP IS ON THE WAY maccies.
    ... Lurky wrote: ... Yeah, that's about it. ... even more foolish one? ... He didn't edit your post. ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: HELP IS ON THE WAY maccies.
    ... Lurky wrote: ... even more foolish one? ... 'I claimed nothing about GEM other than it was available software for the ... (Edwin on GEM) ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)