Re: HELP IS ON THE WAY maccies.

In article <3047c$48419cd1$4246@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Lurky <hidden@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Alan Baker wrote:
In article <26fe$48419a4b$2978@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Lurky <hidden@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Alan Baker wrote:
In article <6672$484196ac$2043@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Lurky <hidden@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Sandman wrote:
In article <91512$48419147$31007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Lurky
<lurky@hidden@all.times> wrote:
I undid your insertion of someone else's name and email address.

The zara:
God! How does Apple do it? A brand new OS every month.
Sandman:
It's pretty amazing. What's MS interval? A patch every six years?
Yeah, that's about it. You're still wainting for that brand new
os. :P
Is it a good idea to answer a foolish statement by trying to make an
even more foolish one?
Yeah, how's that working out for you?
Have I said something foolish?

Why did you edit my post? Are you trying to tell me you're a troll
who's not worth bothering with?
He didn't edit your post.
What changed my name and email address then? Some strange bug in Mac
news readers?

The text that with Edwin's name and email address didn't replace any
text from your post.

It replaced what should have said "Lurky <hidden@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:"

Which wasn't in your post.


It was text he *added* to his post.

Why did you deny he edited the post when you know he added text to it?

He edit his post, not yours. He also did not edit any words that were in
your post.


That he added
that text rather than the name "Lurky" along with its associated fake
email address is his choice.

As it was your choice to deny his editing of the post even though you
knew he had edited it.

He didn't edit your post.


And I agree with it.

You agree with falsifying posts? Why?

I agree that you are another Edwin sockpuppet.

--
"The iPhone doesn't have a speaker phone" -- "I checked very carefully" --
"I checked Apple's web pages" -- Edwin on the iPhone
"It is Mac OS X, not BSD.' -- 'From Mac OS to BSD Unix." -- "It's BSD Unix with Apple's APIs and GUI on top of it' -- 'nothing but BSD Unix' (Edwin on Mac OS X)
'[The IBM PC] could boot multiple OS, such as DOS, C/PM, GEM, etc.' --
'I claimed nothing about GEM other than it was available software for the
IBM PC. (Edwin on GEM)
'Solaris is just a marketing rename of Sun OS.' -- 'Sun OS is not included
on the timeline of Solaris because it's a different OS.' (Edwin on Sun)
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: HELP IS ON THE WAY maccies.
    ... Lurky wrote: ... even more foolish one? ... He didn't edit your post. ... Are you and Sandman playing together in the same sandbox? ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: HELP IS ON THE WAY maccies.
    ... Lurky wrote: ... Is it a good idea to answer a foolish statement by trying to make ... He didn't edit your post. ... I agree that you are another Edwin sockpuppet. ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: HELP IS ON THE WAY maccies.
    ... Lurky wrote: ... even more foolish one? ... He didn't edit your post. ... I agree that you are another Edwin sockpuppet. ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: HELP IS ON THE WAY maccies.
    ... Lurky wrote: ... even more foolish one? ... He didn't edit your post. ... Are you and Sandman playing together in the same sandbox? ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: HELP IS ON THE WAY maccies.
    ... Lurky wrote: ... even more foolish one? ... 'I claimed nothing about GEM other than it was available software for the ... (Edwin on GEM) ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)