Re: Liberal white supremacist makes donations to Planned Parenthood

ed wrote:
On Apr 29, 8:56 pm, Snit <use...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"ed" <n...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> stated in post
81daa38f-6598-45b3-bc9c-5cead25b6...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 4/29/08
8:50 PM:
On Apr 29, 8:45 pm, Snit <use...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"ed" <n...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> stated in post
7965cdd6-90c0-4827-8f39-71df5d4bd...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 4/29/08
8:38 PM:
You continue to look at the world - or at least the question of obesity -
in
very simplistic terms, even though I have pointed you to references which
make it quite clear that the causes and solutions are not nearly as
simplistic as you keep insisting... with *zero* support.
way to ignore my entire post, and my referencing you to support (with
quote, via your own link) shooting down your assertions.
You keep repeating the same BS... and then re-quoting the same thing where
you act like it is a refutation it is not.
Again: obesity's causes and treatments are hardly as simple as you portray
them as. You have had this shown to you in strong terms and have offered no
counter other than to quote one sentence from the source that shows you are
wrong and to pretend it means something it does not.
If you have something of value to add I will certainly give it consideration
- but it seems you have no support.
do you, or do you not, agree with the statement i made, that the very
first sentence, of the very first source, that YOU posted, absolutely
supports my statements (that you claim is overly simplified)?
The source clearly is contrary to your claims... clearly. Completely
unambiguously.

alright dude, if you think "Weight gain and obesity are caused by
consuming more calories than the body needs" is completely,
unambiguously contrary to my claims, you're in clear need of help and
this conversation need not continue. unless of course, you can
explain, in a clear, unambiguous way, how that statement (which pretty
much paraphrases what i've been saying) is contrary to my claims. or
more likely (from the statements i snipped below), you've simply
glommed on to one part of my statement, ignoring the overall point,
while claiming that's what i'm doing, eh?

<snip>

Did you *REALLY* think it was going to go any differently? :)
.

Relevant Pages