Re: OT: Why does Snit lie in the face of reality? He is, as some have stated, a pathological liar?

"Steve Carroll" <noone@xxxxxxxxxxx> stated in post
noone-8BE951.00440414092007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 9/13/07 11:44 PM:

In article <C30F7295.90B0B%CSMA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Snit <CSMA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"Steve Carroll" <noone@xxxxxxxxxxx> stated in post
noone-C08CA7.23422013092007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 9/13/07 10:42 PM:

You clearly said that George found it was "OK to attack people based on skin
color".

Before you said:

to hear Snit tell it... that it's "OK to attack people based on
skin color".

And now you are completely changing your story to say I said *someone* else
said it... not me. I am not going to rehash some debate from 2004 ...
*especially* when your story about it keeps changing!

You're either so stoned that you don't know what the truth is or you're flat
out lying. Take your pick.

LOL! Yeah, how dare I quote your flip flopping, eh?

Face it, Steve, you have so fully and completely humiliated yourself in
every recent conversation you have had that you are resorting to running
back to debates that died in *2004* to try to save some face.

And even then, Steve, you cannot keep your story straight.

Your "tells" of your humiliation:
* repeatedly snipping of all but the first few words of replies
then pretending they said something other than they did
* repeatedly making drug references and substance abuse
allegations
* repeatedly altering subject lines in derogatory and
dishonest ways
* repeatedly refusing to answer questions about the topics
at hand or on your behavior in the current threads
* repeatedly making personal attacks based on your claims of
income, health, sexuality, or other irrelevancies
* repeatedly speaking for others and insisting that is what
they said or meant

You have done *all* of those today *and* over the last several days. All of
them, Steve...

Do you have a defense for your behavior? Will you even acknowledge it? Are
you able to be honest for a single post and admit to your actions and take
even *some* responsibility for your outrageous actions?

My guess: no, you are not able to do so. You are not able to act like an
adult and take responsibility for yourself.


--
The answer to the water shortage is to dilute it.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: OT: Why does Snit lie in the face of reality? He is, as some have stated, a pathological liar?
    ... to hear Snit tell it... ... that it's "OK to attack people based on ... even *some* responsibility for your outrageous actions? ... adult and take responsibility for yourself. ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: If Macs have no spyware....
    ... Are you willing to travel here to accept the challenge. ... Said Snit to himself in a very sticky mirror. ... of having another big bad anxiety attack. ... > So Steve can beg someone to send him a clue [cue Steve's lies about routers, ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
    ... They aren't simply providing different mechanical implementations of exactly the same responsibility, ... where would I would I look for the instructions that handle the attack message sent to Quail? ... The 'attacked' message would be defined in the interface rather than as a method in the ... interface can be a separate model element from the class itself, the mapping can be done outside the class definition when the interface message is mapped to the class operation. ...
    (comp.object)
  • Re: OT: Public challenge for Carroll
    ... You started this thread, gluehead... ... For instance - fear of having a ... "I can not have my BP taken ANYWHERE without bringing on an attack; ... going to tell me what I'm thinking and feeling again, Snit? ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: Army
    ... Do you mean by that that the reason terrorists attack is because their ... abject poverty in 3rd world countries. ... other special responsibility of the powerful, ...
    (talk.politics.guns)