Re: Steve Carroll does not know the difference between saving and quitting.




On 29/4/08 2:24 AM, in article C43B6467.B5D78%usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
"Snit" <usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"Wally" <Wally@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> stated in post
C43C1CDA.1BBC9%Wally@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 4/28/08 9:31 AM:

...

When you press the red close button (or otherwise close) the last window of
a program there is no GUI indicator to tell the user if the program will
quit or not.

Why should there be?

It will close the app if it is unable to be used any further with that
window closed, or in an app where it can be used for additional work it
won't!

Most apps cannot be used with no window open... Photoshop for example and
yet it does not quit.

And nor should it Snit!

I could have multiple images sitting on multiple clipboards just waiting to
be used in Photoshop at my leisure on either one or many different projects,
so why would I want Photoshop to quit between closing the last of the files
that I copied from and opening the first of the projects? ... Should I have
to open a project *before* closing the last window that I copied from Snit
just to stop Photoshop from quitting? ... Of course not!

Nor does iCal or Cyberduck or Safari or Firefox or
Dreamweaver or ... well, on and on and on.

But they are all still usable?...no?

"It will close the app if it is unable to be used any further with that
window closed, or in an app where it can be used for additional work it
won't!"-Wally

All perfectly predictable behavior Snit, no further dialog boxes needed!

This creates a situation where there is unpredictability.

It will close the app if it is unable to be used any further with that
particular window closed, or in an app where it can be used for additional
work it won't!

That is completely predictable!

Already been established you are incorrect.

Established? ... By whom? You? The person that seems to consider an app no
longer usable simply because at any one moment in time it doesn't have a
window active?.... LOL!

I believe it would be better if there was some GUI indicator...

Where is the need considering that the name of the app will remain shown
after the act of closing a window has taken place if the app has not quit?

What you are "considering" is something that happens *after* you press the
red button...

You are wrong Snit what I was "considering" was something that was occurring
*all* the time that the app was active!

Read what you wrote Snit and what it was in response to, you are clearly
suggesting that the name of the app appearing "is something that happens
*after* you press the red button..." please put a little more thought into
what you are trying to get across!

not before. It does not help with bettering predictability.

Close a window the app stays active if still usable until the *user* decides
that it is no longer needed! .... How more predictable can it get?


I for one do not need to be told what I can plainly see Snit, why are you
advocating such duplication of user alerts?

You cannot see what has not yet happened.

You're rambling Snit! In my example I would plainly see that the app was
active even though all windows were closed I simply would not need "some GUI
indicator..." that you are advocating to see the obvious!

...

exactly what
is not the point but to have a dialog that tells you *after* you press the
red button does not solve the problem well at all and is not a part of what
*I* have suggested.

As there is already a clear indication whether an app has quit after a
window has been closed Snit .... there simply is no problem to solve!

I am talking about knowing *before* you press the button.

What!!! You want the app... Photoshop for example to be able to tell that
the user was about to press the red close button?

How would you suggest it do that?... Perhaps another dialog box asking if
the user has any intention of closing the window in the near future and if
the user answers in the affirmative yet another dialog box could offer an
array of approximate time periods when this may occur!

Oh - and in case you missed it, yeah, I was mocking.... Well you get the
picture!

You offered Photoshop as an example Snit, how many people would you consider
would need "some GUI indicator..." to tell them that Photoshop *will not*
quit if they closed the last window that was active?

You are talking about knowing *after* you press the button.

How could a dialog be presented to the user in anticipation of him/her
closing a window Snit? You're being absurd, of course it would have to occur
after!

The words "before" and "after" are not synonymous.

Of course, for the unobservant or inexperienced or simply not-too-bright
user they do not even know some programs quit and some do not...

I will for the moment assume that all the people that you list above have
sight and can at least read Snit therefore can avail themselves of the
indicators that are at present built into OS X.

And yet Steve Carroll knew of only one such program.

Or did he merely cite one Snit?

or can only think of one application.

As an example only one is needed!

As an example? Again you are going off topic.

Not at all... Why did Steve mention this *one* app at all if not as an
example?

Oh - in case you miss it, yeah, I am mocking Steve's ignorance with that
last
statement.

Which is an indictment of you rather than he Snit!

Gee, your opinion on that will eat me up... especially so soon after you and
Steve Carroll and Tim Adams and Alan Baker and Steve Mackay and Tim Adams
have all been absolutely proved to lie to defend each other.

"Again you are going off topic."-Snit

You just can't help being a hypocrite can you Snit even on topics computer
related?

Poor abused Stevie.. he is just
such a nice guy for me to pick on, eh?

Eh? Indeed!




.