Re: More people who use DACs...


"Alan Baker" <alangbaker@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:alangbaker-B573CF.10075922042008@[74.223.185.199.nw.nuvox.net]...
In article <ful5o0$4mt$1@xxxxxxxx>, "Mr. X" <Mr.X@xxxxxxx> wrote:

Alan Baker wrote:
In article <ful4c7$tri$1@xxxxxxxx>, "Mr. X" <Mr.X@xxxxxxx> wrote:

Alan Baker wrote:
In article <ful0ah$bmg$1@xxxxxxxx>, "Mr. X" <Mr.X@xxxxxxx> wrote:

Alan Baker wrote:
In article <fuks1l$pk8$1@xxxxxxxx>, "Mr. X" <Mr.X@xxxxxxx> wrote:
And tell it to the university whose link I provided you before.
No, I'll just tell you that you don't understand the material you're
referencing. Much as you have no understanding of mechanical
engineering.

You'll tell me that without explaining what you mean, of course...

Of course. Why should I waste my time on somebody who isn't interested
in the correct answer, and who can't understand it anyway?

LOL

Here's why you won't:

You don't have the least clue.

I've presented you references from wikipedia, companies and universities
-- all of which agree with each other that there are DACs without any
kind of smoothing circuitry, you've presented...

Come on now, Alan. Everyone knows you really don't want to hear anything
to refute your inaccurate and erroneous statements. When I pointed out
"technical errors" that you posted, you went off the deep end, vehemently
denied you were in error ( which in fact, you were) and then got insulting.
You really don't want correction, you want everyone to accept your
incoherent, inaccurate pontifications.

Stick to skiing. Or at least take a few courses on the topics you want to
pass yourself off as an expert on.

Or better yet - emulate -hh. Flood everyone with massive amounts of
Bull*** and just bury them.


.