Re: More people who use DACs...
- From: "Mr. X" <Mr.X@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 12:44:21 -0500
Alan Baker wrote:
In article <ful5o0$4mt$1@xxxxxxxx>, "Mr. X" <Mr.X@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Alan Baker wrote:In article <ful4c7$tri$1@xxxxxxxx>, "Mr. X" <Mr.X@xxxxxxx> wrote:Of course. Why should I waste my time on somebody who isn't interested in the correct answer, and who can't understand it anyway?
Alan Baker wrote:You'll tell me that without explaining what you mean, of course...In article <ful0ah$bmg$1@xxxxxxxx>, "Mr. X" <Mr.X@xxxxxxx> wrote:No, I'll just tell you that you don't understand the material you're referencing. Much as you have no understanding of mechanical engineering.
Alan Baker wrote:Tell these folks that:In article <fuks1l$pk8$1@xxxxxxxx>, "Mr. X" <Mr.X@xxxxxxx> wrote:Then you demonstrated an incomplete DAC because you don't understand the subject.
Alan Baker wrote:As I already demonstrated in another post, there are DACs that don't have any smoothing circuitry....but don't understand them as well as Edwin:So you think a DAC puts out discrete voltage levels? Only if you remove the circuitry that smooths its output into sine waves.
"When the fan is on, a 4-bit binary value is specified by the MCU with 4 port pins. This value is then converted to a 0-12V voltage by the DAC, with 16 discrete voltages in between."
But, what would *they* know? It's just Cornell University...
<http://instruct1.cit.cornell.edu/courses/ee476/FinalProjects/s2005/sg
34
8
_ekl25/html/hardware.html>
<http://www.ikalogic.com/dac08.php>
And these:
<http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/vol_4/chpt_13/2.html>
Tell wikipedia:
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital-to-analog_converter>
And tell it to the university whose link I provided you before.
LOL
Here's why you won't:
You don't have the least clue.
I've presented you references from wikipedia, companies and universities -- all of which agree with each other that there are DACs without any kind of smoothing circuitry, you've presented...
As I've already said, you don't understand the material you're referencing.
...next to nothing.I suppose you think that scores you some kind of points. Good for you. Type it in again below.LOLWhat makes you think that's anything but a dodge? A juvenile one at that.LOLWhat's funny about that?You ought to stop debating engineering topics Alan. They're obviously over your head.LOL
LOL
Run along, Sonny. I've wasted enough time on you.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: More people who use DACs...
- From: Alan Baker
- Re: More people who use DACs...
- References:
- More people who use DACs...
- From: Alan Baker
- Re: More people who use DACs...
- From: Mr. X
- Re: More people who use DACs...
- From: Alan Baker
- Re: More people who use DACs...
- From: Mr. X
- Re: More people who use DACs...
- From: Alan Baker
- Re: More people who use DACs...
- From: Mr. X
- Re: More people who use DACs...
- From: Alan Baker
- Re: More people who use DACs...
- From: Mr. X
- Re: More people who use DACs...
- From: Alan Baker
- More people who use DACs...
- Prev by Date: Re: It doesn't matter if Psystar is real or not.
- Next by Date: Re: macAir a DUD
- Previous by thread: Re: More people who use DACs...
- Next by thread: Re: More people who use DACs...
- Index(es):