Re: More people who use DACs...

Alan Baker wrote:
In article <ful4c7$tri$1@xxxxxxxx>, "Mr. X" <Mr.X@xxxxxxx> wrote:

Alan Baker wrote:
In article <ful0ah$bmg$1@xxxxxxxx>, "Mr. X" <Mr.X@xxxxxxx> wrote:

Alan Baker wrote:
In article <fuks1l$pk8$1@xxxxxxxx>, "Mr. X" <Mr.X@xxxxxxx> wrote:

Alan Baker wrote:
...but don't understand them as well as Edwin:

"When the fan is on, a 4-bit binary value is specified by the MCU with 4 port pins. This value is then converted to a 0-12V voltage by the DAC, with 16 discrete voltages in between."

But, what would *they* know? It's just Cornell University...

<http://instruct1.cit.cornell.edu/courses/ee476/FinalProjects/s2005/sg34
8
_ekl25/html/hardware.html>
So you think a DAC puts out discrete voltage levels? Only if you remove the circuitry that smooths its output into sine waves.
As I already demonstrated in another post, there are DACs that don't have any smoothing circuitry.
Then you demonstrated an incomplete DAC because you don't understand the subject.
Tell these folks that:

<http://www.ikalogic.com/dac08.php>

And these:

<http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/vol_4/chpt_13/2.html>

Tell wikipedia:

<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital-to-analog_converter>

And tell it to the university whose link I provided you before.
No, I'll just tell you that you don't understand the material you're referencing. Much as you have no understanding of mechanical engineering.

You'll tell me that without explaining what you mean, of course...

Of course. Why should I waste my time on somebody who isn't interested in the correct answer, and who can't understand it anyway?

You ought to stop debating engineering topics Alan. They're obviously over your head.
LOL
What's funny about that?
LOL
What makes you think that's anything but a dodge? A juvenile one at that.

LOL

I suppose you think that scores you some kind of points. Good for you. Type it in again below.
.

Quantcast