Re: Yep, some more actual Mac advocacy (This is comp.sys.mac.advocacy, after all)

On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 08:04:43 -0700, Hasta La Vista wrote
(in article <WcydnaWYrLoMUp3VnZ2dnUVZ_gCdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx>):


"Mayor of R'lyeh" <mayor.of.rlyeh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:qhc0041l62v65pvpf1msokinmb1u4r74s2@xxxxxxxxxx
On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 00:42:45 +0200, Sandman <mr@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

In article <5eavv39f8r5ddgk8aq705enoj9oheuur6c@xxxxxxx>,
Mayor of R'lyeh <mayor.of.rlyeh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 10:22:15 -0700 (PDT), Dave Fritzinger
<dfritzin@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Interesting article in Business Week.

http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/apr2008/tc20080410_206881.
htm

"The 20-year death grip that Microsoft has held on the core of
computing is finally weakening--pried loose with just two fingers. With
one finger you press "Control" and with the other you press "right
arrow." Instantly you switch from a Macintosh operating system (OS) to
a Microsoft Windows OS. Then, with another two-finger press, you
switch back again. So as you edit family pictures, you might use Mac's
iPhoto. And when you want to access your corporate e-mail, you can
switch back instantly to Microsoft Exchange."

I've been saying for months that Apple is missing a Golden Opportunity
by not making the fact that any OS can run on Macs the centerpiece of
an ad campaign. It might not sit well with the Mac Faithful but it
would certainly make a lot of other people take a second look at Mac
HW.

The Get a Mac ads have mentioned this on several occasions.

Its been mentioned in passing but I'm talking about launching a
campaign that has that point as its centerpiece.
Of course it would require Apple ads to actually promote Apple
products instead of taking cheapshots at Microsoft based on
half-truths and outright lies.

If running Windows becomes the center point of Apple's ad campaign, how will
they convince people to pay more for hardware to run Windows?


You won't convince them. The fact that a Mac CAN run Windows doesn't mean
that most do. In fact, most don't. You pay a bit more for hardware (in some
cases) from Apple to run OSX. If you want to (or have to) run Windows, buy a
Windows box and skip the Mac.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Apple Notebook
    ... die gerne mit Unix Befehlen arbeiten und sich freuen, ... mich stören weder UNIX-Befehle (neben Mac OS X benutze ich selbst z.B. u.A. auch HP-UX, UNIX ist für mich also kein Fremder) noch Leute, die mit ihrem Mac zufrieden sind. ... Mich stört auch nicht, dass Windows mit Ausnahme von Windows Server 2003 R2 keine UNIX-Befehle kann, genauer gesagt geht mir das ziemlich am Allerwertesten vorbei, einfach weil der Bedarf nicht vorhanden ist. ... Und das nicht nur deswegen, weil Apple schlichtweg keinen professionellen Support anbietet, sondern weil die Masse der wichtigen Anwendungen eben nicht unter Mac OS X läuft, sondern unter Windows oder allenfalls noch Linux. ...
    (de.comp.sys.notebooks)
  • Re: Cult Of Mac Members List
    ... As a user fo Apple computers myself, ... Actually I find most Mac users in here to be informed. ... found in OS X than Windows XP. ... So are Linux and Unix users. ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Dvorak Writes Stupidest Computer Article Of All Time
    ... Hey Mac Advocates! ... Shame on them paying Dvorak to write it!! ... Will Apple Adopt Windows? ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: $1100 laptop shootout, MacBook vs Dell Inspiron E1045
    ... A normal Windows user wouldn't come here in the first place ... But the point is that you AREN'T a Mac user, ... Apple and its products are immaterial ... Maccie double standard at work, ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: $1100 laptop shootout, MacBook vs Dell Inspiron E1045
    ... A normal Windows user wouldn't come here in the first place ... But the point is that you AREN'T a Mac user, ... Apple and its products are immaterial ... Maccie double standard at work, ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)