Re: Hackers Hit A New Low

"The zara" <Scumbag Joey is fucked@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> stated in post
BqbIj.23742$Er2.14557@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 3/31/08 1:02 PM:

Hey, if you don't wasn't to address the issue, don't open the door. I
simply addressed the non reality of what you wrote about Snit not being
a perpetrator. I showed Snit preparing a new sock puppet for use in a
newsgroup based on people with health problems. Who do you know of,
other than Snit, that would do such a thing?

You and Sandman seem to fit that description.

Yet it's only Snit that we find concrete proof of having done so.
Reality is not so bad... c'mon... give it a try.

Show the proof.

Such proof cannot be shown being that I never "prepared a new sock puppet
for use in a newsgroup based on people with health problems"... though I did
once post with the name "Brock McNuggets" into such a group *by mistake* and
then told people about the mistake. I had used that name elsewhere and
simply forgot to switch the name back in an email client...

.... and, of course, that was done *years* ago in *another* forum and is 100%
irrelevant to anything to do with CSMA. Those that focus and lie about such
things are clearly showing their own lack of morals and desperation to not
have their own relevant and recent actions looked at.

Check out my recent posts where I responded by reporting someone to their
ISP - those were in response to truly despicable actions.


--
BU__SH__



.

Quantcast