Re: Hackers Hit A New Low

"Sandman" <mr@xxxxxxxxxxx> stated in post
mr-88312A.21020931032008@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 3/31/08 1:02 PM:

I have been posting online for years - only a couple cretins on CSMA have
ever sunk so low...

I won't take your word for that, though.

If you will not take my word then why even ask?

I never asked you about who "ever sunk so low".

Nor do you need to - you know. And you know who sides with those people,
hence the reason you absolutely refuse to say such simple things as *of
course* {0} is not in a subset of integers 1 through 10... and of course
Wally was flat our wrong about even basic set theory. You won't say that
because he often aligns himself with those who "sink so low" and you are not
willing to oppose that group.

In fact you run whenever this topic is brought up. The very mention of it
is beyond your ability to quote - that is how much they have you cowed.
Then you pretend you do not know why they target me and not you. That is
dishonest of you, Sandman.

....
Are you saying that quotes from people expressing their dislike about
you does not constitute proof that you are disliked? What would you
consider to be proof of people disliking you from a historical point
of view?

I am saying quote scavenging "contests" are silly. Here: I grant that you
are a better quote scavenger than I am - or at least than I care to be. You
win... I shall not even enter the contest: let us both acknowledge that you
can (and are willing to) dredge up more disparaging quotes than I am.

OK, now that your quote scavenging BS is handled, are you willing to
actually get back to the topic of *behavior* and not of side issues such as
quote scavenging?

<snip more comments about Sandman's splendid quote scavenging abilities, his
dishonest denials of his behavior, etc.>

....
You even lied and claimed *I* agreed with his
ignorant BS ... and your "evidence" was to take a single word of mine out of
context - you repeatedly snipped the context where I explained my views.

Sounds more lke when you ignore everything I write. :-D

Nope: it is when you took the word "right:", with the colon, out of context.
Easy to show if you want me to.

<snip rest of Snits Wallyobsession>

What you snipped:
-----
But you are afraid to admit that Wally is flat out wrong -
Wally and the "perpetrators" of CSMA often side together
(even if Wally does not join them in their most despicable
actions). For you to go against Wally (especially as he
spews lies about me and as I point out his ignorance) would
be to risk the wrath of the very people you seem so proud do
not "dislike" you. Of course they do not speak poorly of you
or anyone else they have cowed. Notice how many times you
snipped and ran - scared as a bunny - when I asked you about
Wally's ignorant claims.
-----

Notice how you repeatedly run from such information. You prove me right
about you over and over and over and over.


--
What do you call people who are afraid of Santa Claus? Claustrophobic.

.

Quantcast