Re: Hackers Hit A New Low

In article <3e8Ij.25375$dT.11815@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"The zara" <Scumbag Joey is fucked@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"Steve Carroll" <trollkiller@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:trollkiller-15A6E4.09302031032008@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article <ng7Ij.27889$rC6.14741@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"The zara" <Scumbag Joey is fucked@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"Steve Carroll" <trollkiller@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:trollkiller-E63621.08071431032008@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article <9q4Ij.12146$9O.8218@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"The zara" <Scumbag Joey is fucked@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"Sandman" <mr@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:mr-03D5DE.13415431032008@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article <C4158111.B12E4%usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Snit <usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Disgusting.

http://www.wired.com/politics/security/news/2008/03/epilepsy#

Agreed - that is repulsive. Sadly I have seen similar demented
folks
try
to
attack people in anxiety disorder groups or, as seen in CSMA, even
seen
people hunt down others health concerns and try to use that in
their
trolling.

Has never happened me. Why you and not me?

You are a perpetrator, he is not.

Yeah... right;)

From another post I just wrote:
--
Here is concrete proof that Snit used the Brock McNuggets sock puppet
in
another newsgroup (before csma)... a poster wrote this after outing
Snit
due to Snit's carelessness:

"Good grief, Snit - I would never have thought Brock McNuggets was
YOU".


Snit's reply tried to pretend he'd made some sort of honest 'mistake'
(as if one could do that with sock puppets), but it's followed by an
easily proven lie. Snit writes:

"Oops. I am just setting up my new computer and I forgot to change the
name back to snit before posting. But, yes, Brock McNuggets is another
name I sometimes use. I just find it funny".
<gF_C7.53265$W87.3192812@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

If you do a google search for Brock McNuggets before the date of this
'Brock McNuggets post' he is being confronted with you won't a single
"posting" event using that name, not "sometimes", as Snit is shown
claiming here, or any other time. Obviously, Snit was preparing to
troll
in a newsgroup devoted to people prone to anxiety with a brand new sock
puppet... got busted immediately... and then proceeded to lie about it.

(cue up Snit's BS machine... we can probably expect some outrageous
story that will attempt to stretch reality far beyond belief)
--

That ng had all kinds of turmoil going on in it... I wonder how many
sock puppets Snit has used there... we know he used many in here.

--
"Apple is pushing how green this is - but it [Macbook Air] is
clearly disposable... when the battery dies you can pretty much
just throw it away". - Snit

This has absolutely nothing to do with this thread.

Hey, if you don't wasn't to address the issue, don't open the door. I
simply addressed the non reality of what you wrote about Snit not being
a perpetrator. I showed Snit preparing a new sock puppet for use in a
newsgroup based on people with health problems. Who do you know of,
other than Snit, that would do such a thing?

You and Sandman seem to fit that description.

Yet it's only Snit that we find concrete proof of having done so.
Reality is not so bad... c'mon... give it a try.

--
"Apple is pushing how green this is - but it [Macbook Air] is
clearly disposable... when the battery dies you can pretty much
just throw it away". - Snit
.

Quantcast