Re: Just because he can


"Snit" <usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:C40F05EB.B047A%usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Hasta La Vista" <noemail@xxxxxxxxx> stated in post
FZSdnQgEvv2ZNnTanZ2dnUVZ_hKdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx on 3/25/08 6:46 PM:


"Sandman" <mr@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:mr-28DABB.14002625032008@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article <CrednZnlk7dr73XanZ2dnUVZ_veinZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Hasta La Vista" <noemail@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"Alan Baker" <alangbaker@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:alangbaker-97FFF7.20243424032008@[74.223.185.199.nw.nuvox.net]...
In article <4-qdnXSH8PIV8nXanZ2dnUVZ_g2dnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Hasta La Vista" <noemail@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

<tom_elam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:gjhgu31jumo4nne4f8nhecuqdltfmbgaff@xxxxxxxxxx


http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2008/03/24/mozilla_and_the_apple_itunes_
upd
ate/


I experienced this one myself. I get QuickTime updates from time
to
time,
and I usually check "okay" without paying too much attention, but
since I
saw this thread, I've been paying attention.

Today the box said "Safari" with a checkbox even though it was a
QuickTime
upgrade dialog. If I hadn't just clicked okay like I usually did, I
would
have been wondering how Safari got on my PC.

Strange, Edwin.

Yes, you are strange, Gimp.

You claimed that you'd already installed Safari and yet now you say it
offered to install it today...

Two different computers, Gimp.

Are you doing SETI@Home on any of them? :-D

Whose email address is that? What do you mean by doing an email
address?

My guess: Sandman is showing he cannot let go of past accusations, even
though he publicly agreed to let the past go.

A shame: for a while he was acting at least mostly in an honorable way.

Thorazine is scarce where he lives. He must have run out.


.

Loading