Re: macAir CPU is non exclusive!



Snit wrote:
"Steve de Mena" <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> stated in post
BLydnXU11P1O_DvanZ2dnUVZ_rDinZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxx on 2/3/08 5:52 PM:

nospamatall wrote:
Lefty Bigfoot wrote:
On Sat, 2 Feb 2008 13:34:38 -0600, nospamatall wrote
(in article <fo2gkm$b8m$2@xxxxxxxx>):

zara wrote:
Another apple "invention" -stolen.

http://www.news.com/one-more-thing/?tag=blogHed

CNET News.com has learned that Lenovo and Fujitsu are in the process of
putting together systems based on the special Core 2 Duo chip that Apple
is using in the MacBook Air. The new laptops should be out shortly.


And I suppose your next piece of news will be that it isn't made out of
cabbage leaves.
That's okay, it'll be 0.001" thinner, and fit in a slightly
smaller envelope, which will make it better.



Too subtle for you too. I meant, "macbook air cpu is not exclusive" is
as much a revalation as that it isn't made out of cabbage leaves. The
CPU, not the computer. sheesh.
Many around here acted as if Intel designed the chip exclusively for
Apple. It obviously wasn't.

They may very well have designed it for Apple... that does not imply that
other would not also use it.


I'd say that Jobs got the dog and pony show from Intel, Jobs made a few suggestions, Intel executed those suggestions figuring it to be the best route for all. After all, Apple did get the first shipment of chips.
Can you imagine if Jobs got his shipments of AMD Phenoms for the Mac Pro? A major ouch.

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Where Apple Makes its Revenue
    ... Apple could dictate much better terms. ... I'm not so sure that Jobs will ever do it though. ... of anything Intel was offering at the time. ... laptops took forever, and then the G5 laptops never happened. ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: Jobs and Gates
    ... Steve Jobs played it very cool during the interview. ... that circa 1997 Microsoft were shoved into a corner by Apple ... is going to sue Microsoft's ass off, or Gates is keeping quiet ... downward spiral into the commodity (with a foreign Moto chip) abyss. ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: Computer
    ... Apple went for the Intel chip because of the power consumption vs. ...
    (rec.photo.digital)
  • Re: Safari/MacBook falls in seconds
    ... AMD didn't have the low-power roadmap that Intel had with the Core, ... Some people are stuck in the past and would rather Apple have stayed with the slower power-hungry PPCs forever. ... This has never been true of Intel's Core architecture, and Apple has never used a pre-Core chip in a Mac. ... Reducing power consumption lowers their so called carbon foot print. ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • RE: Status of 6.0 for production systems
    ... >> Jobs changed over to Intel for two reasons. ... Once again typical Apple apologizing. ... When Apple dumped MacOS Classic ...
    (freebsd-questions)