Re: computers review
- From: Snit <CSMA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 07:48:50 -0700
"Tim Adams" <teadams$2$0$0$3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> stated in post
teadams$2$0$0$3-9AF92F.05500707012008@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on
1/7/08 3:50 AM:
I fabricated no story Snit!...
Incorrect. You very much did fabricate such as story. You asked:
So you are claiming to be in a position to have tried the
physical things on Steve's computer and to have proven it to
be a hardware problem?
You then continued as if the answer to your question was "yes". You created
a story about my having physical access to his machine.
So asking a question is now 'fabricating a story'.
Incorrect. What an absurd thing for you to say, Tim. Frankly that is an
ignorance claim, even from you.
--
I am one of only .3% of people who have avoided becoming a statistic.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: computers review
- From: Tim Adams
- Re: computers review
- References:
- Re: computers review
- From: Wally
- Re: computers review
- From: Wally
- Re: computers review
- From: Snit
- Re: computers review
- From: Wally
- Re: computers review
- From: Steve Carroll
- Re: computers review
- From: Wally
- Re: computers review
- From: Snit
- Re: computers review
- From: Wally
- Re: computers review
- From: Snit
- Re: computers review
- From: Wally
- Re: computers review
- From: Snit
- Re: computers review
- From: Wally
- Re: computers review
- From: Snit
- Re: computers review
- From: Wally
- Re: computers review
- From: Tim Adams
- Re: computers review
- From: Snit
- Re: computers review
- From: Wally
- Re: computers review
- From: Snit
- Re: computers review
- From: Tim Adams
- Re: computers review
- Prev by Date: Re: Apple Market Share Continues To Grow Worldwide
- Next by Date: Re: computers review
- Previous by thread: Re: computers review
- Next by thread: Re: computers review
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|