Re: 32 bit vista can't address more than 3.1-3.5 GB RAM
- From: "Daniel Johnson" <danieljohnson2@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2007 20:35:26 -0500
"Snit" <CSMA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:C3959316.9EFD0%CSMA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Daniel Johnson" <danieljohnson2@xxxxxxxxxxx> stated in post
13n0ev7a5b0ic2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 12/24/07 4:08 PM:
There's no sense in going 64-bit on such a system.
When "general consumer computers" move beyond 4 GB, then 64-bit Vista will
be a "general consumer version of Windows".
With OS X you are already there... with Windows, well, someday. OK.
I appreciate you like the hybrid approach OS X takes- you've only told me 1,386,124 times after all- but OS X is not "already there". OS X simply doesn't have a 64-bit version. It's a 32-bit OS with some extensions.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- 32 bit vista can't address more than 3.1-3.5 GB RAM
- From: Jesper
- Re: 32 bit vista can't address more than 3.1-3.5 GB RAM
- From: Snit
- Re: 32 bit vista can't address more than 3.1-3.5 GB RAM
- From: Ilgaz Öcal
- Re: 32 bit vista can't address more than 3.1-3.5 GB RAM
- From: Snit
- Re: 32 bit vista can't address more than 3.1-3.5 GB RAM
- From: Lefty Bigfoot
- Re: 32 bit vista can't address more than 3.1-3.5 GB RAM
- From: Daniel Johnson
- Re: 32 bit vista can't address more than 3.1-3.5 GB RAM
- From: Snit
- 32 bit vista can't address more than 3.1-3.5 GB RAM
- Prev by Date: Re: Safari - Super POS
- Next by Date: Re: 32 bit vista can't address more than 3.1-3.5 GB RAM
- Previous by thread: Re: 32 bit vista can't address more than 3.1-3.5 GB RAM
- Next by thread: Re: 32 bit vista can't address more than 3.1-3.5 GB RAM
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
